Llewellyn/exa
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Llewellynvdm/exa.git synced 2024-11-15 16:57:08 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
2382be7524
exa/devtools/dev-package-for-linux.sh

76 lines
3.1 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

Move the packaging script into its own file Having it all echo-ed into the file like that made it hard to read *and* hard to maintain. My initial aversion to it was that I didn’t want there to be an executable script in the main repository that only worked when you were in the VM, because people would just run it anyway. But this can be avoided by leaving it non-executable, and having a command in the VM that runs it instead.
2017-10-01 07:48:20 +00:00
set -e
# This script builds a publishable release-worthy version of exa.
# It gets the version number, builds exa using cargo, tests it, strips the
# binary, compresses it into a zip, then puts it in /vagrant so it’s
# accessible from the host machine.
#
# If you’re in the VM, you can run it using the ‘package-exa’ command.
Linux check for Linux script These changes are mostly just to mirror the macOS packaging script.
2017-10-01 08:55:38 +00:00
# Linux check!
uname=`uname -s`
if [[ "$uname" != "Linux" ]]; then
echo "Gotta be on Linux to run this (detected '$uname')!"
exit 1
fi
Move the packaging script into its own file Having it all echo-ed into the file like that made it hard to read *and* hard to maintain. My initial aversion to it was that I didn’t want there to be an executable script in the main repository that only worked when you were in the VM, because people would just run it anyway. But this can be avoided by leaving it non-executable, and having a command in the VM that runs it instead.
2017-10-01 07:48:20 +00:00
# First, we need to get the version number to figure out what to call the zip.
# We do this by getting the first line from the Cargo.toml that matches
# /version/, removing its whitespace, and building a command out of it, so the
# shell executes something like `exa_version="0.8.0"`, which it understands as
# a variable definition. Hey, it’s not a hack if it works.
toml_file="/vagrant/Cargo.toml"
eval exa_$(grep version $toml_file | head -n 1 | sed "s/ //g")
if [ -z "$exa_version" ]; then
echo "Failed to parse version number! Can't build exa!"
Linux check for Linux script These changes are mostly just to mirror the macOS packaging script.
2017-10-01 08:55:38 +00:00
exit 1
Rename the zips for weekly releases
2017-10-08 19:44:34 +00:00
fi
# Weekly builds have a bit more information in their version number (see build.rs).
if [[ "$1" == "--weekly" ]]; then
git_hash=`GIT_DIR=/vagrant/.git git rev-parse --short --verify HEAD`
date=`date +"%Y-%m-%d"`
echo "Building exa weekly v$exa_version, date $date, Git hash $git_hash"
Move the packaging script into its own file Having it all echo-ed into the file like that made it hard to read *and* hard to maintain. My initial aversion to it was that I didn’t want there to be an executable script in the main repository that only worked when you were in the VM, because people would just run it anyway. But this can be avoided by leaving it non-executable, and having a command in the VM that runs it instead.
2017-10-01 07:48:20 +00:00
else
echo "Building exa v$exa_version"
fi
# Compilation is done in --release mode, which takes longer but produces a
# faster binary. This binary gets built to a different place, so the extended
# tests script needs to be told which one to use.
echo -e "\n\033[4mCompiling release version of exa...\033[0m"
exa_linux_binary="/vagrant/exa-linux-x86_64"
rm -vf "$exa_linux_binary"
cargo build --release --manifest-path "$toml_file"
cargo test --release --manifest-path "$toml_file" --lib -- --quiet
/vagrant/xtests/run.sh --release
Change user in Vagrantfile Why I have to keep doing this I have no idea. If you know, please tell!
2018-09-26 20:25:50 +00:00
cp /home/vagrant/target/release/exa "$exa_linux_binary"
Move the packaging script into its own file Having it all echo-ed into the file like that made it hard to read *and* hard to maintain. My initial aversion to it was that I didn’t want there to be an executable script in the main repository that only worked when you were in the VM, because people would just run it anyway. But this can be avoided by leaving it non-executable, and having a command in the VM that runs it instead.
2017-10-01 07:48:20 +00:00
# Stripping the binary before distributing it removes a bunch of debugging
# symbols, saving some space.
echo -e "\n\033[4mStripping binary...\033[0m"
strip -v "$exa_linux_binary"
# Compress the binary for upload. The ‘-j’ flag is necessary to avoid the
# /vagrant path being in the zip too. Only the zip gets the version number, so
Linux check for Linux script These changes are mostly just to mirror the macOS packaging script.
2017-10-01 08:55:38 +00:00
# the binaries can have consistent names, and it’s still possible to tell
Move the packaging script into its own file Having it all echo-ed into the file like that made it hard to read *and* hard to maintain. My initial aversion to it was that I didn’t want there to be an executable script in the main repository that only worked when you were in the VM, because people would just run it anyway. But this can be avoided by leaving it non-executable, and having a command in the VM that runs it instead.
2017-10-01 07:48:20 +00:00
# different *downloads* apart.
echo -e "\n\033[4mZipping binary...\033[0m"
Rename the zips for weekly releases
2017-10-08 19:44:34 +00:00
if [[ "$1" == "--weekly" ]]
then exa_linux_zip="/vagrant/exa-linux-x86_64-${exa_version}-${date}-${git_hash}.zip"
else exa_linux_zip="/vagrant/exa-linux-x86_64-${exa_version}.zip"
fi
Move the packaging script into its own file Having it all echo-ed into the file like that made it hard to read *and* hard to maintain. My initial aversion to it was that I didn’t want there to be an executable script in the main repository that only worked when you were in the VM, because people would just run it anyway. But this can be avoided by leaving it non-executable, and having a command in the VM that runs it instead.
2017-10-01 07:48:20 +00:00
rm -vf "$exa_linux_zip"
zip -j "$exa_linux_zip" "$exa_linux_binary"
# There was a problem a while back where a library was getting unknowingly
# *dynamically* linked, which broke the whole ‘self-contained binary’ concept.
# So dump the linker table, in case anything unscrupulous shows up.
echo -e "\n\033[4mLibraries linked:\033[0m"
ldd "$exa_linux_binary" | sed "s/\t//"
# Might as well use it to test itself, right?
echo -e "\n\033[4mAll done! Files produced:\033[0m"
"$exa_linux_binary" "$exa_linux_binary" "$exa_linux_zip" -lB
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink