mirror of
https://github.com/Llewellynvdm/exa.git
synced 2024-06-08 10:20:48 +00:00
c475cccce4
I changed my mind about which way round sorting by “newest” or by “oldest” should actually go. If you’re listing a large directory, you see the last lines of the output first, so these files should be the ones with the largest whatever the sort field is. It’s about sorting *last*, not sorting *first*. Sorting by size wouldn’t say “sorts smallest files first”, it would say “sorts largest files last”. Right? Also, add a new suggestion that warns against “ls -lt”.
3 lines
141 B
Plaintext
3 lines
141 B
Plaintext
Option --time (-t) has no "r" setting (choices: modified, accessed, created)
|
|
To sort oldest files last, try "--sort oldest", or just "-sold"
|