e86f2b938b
Fix month name not following locale when date is in current year |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
features | ||
outputs | ||
attributes.toml | ||
colour-term.toml | ||
debug-logging.toml | ||
details-view-dates.toml | ||
details-view-filesizes.toml | ||
details-view-passwd.toml | ||
details-view-permissions.toml | ||
details-view.toml | ||
dotfiles.toml | ||
errors.toml | ||
git-ignore.toml | ||
git.toml | ||
grid-details-view.toml | ||
grid-view.toml | ||
help.toml | ||
icons.toml | ||
ignore-glob.toml | ||
input-options.toml | ||
lines-view.toml | ||
README.md | ||
run.sh | ||
sorting.toml | ||
themes.toml | ||
tree-view.toml |
exa › xtests
These are the extended tests. They are integration tests: they run the exa
binary with select configurations of parameters and environment variables, and assert that the program prints the correct text to standard output and error, and exits with the correct status code.
They test things like:
- broken symlinks
- extended attributes
- file names with weird stuff like newlines or escapes in
- invalid UTF-8
- missing users and groups
- nested Git repositories
They are intended to be run from the Vagrant VM that has already had its environment set up — see the devtools/dev-create-test-filesystem.sh
script for how the files are generated.
Anatomy of the tests
The tests are run using Specsheet. The TOML files define the tests, and the files in output/
contain the output that exa should produce.
For example, let’s look at one of the tests in lines-view.toml
. This test checks that running exa does the right thing when running with the -1
argument, and a directory full of files:
[[cmd]]
name = "‘exa -1’ displays file names, one on each line"
shell = "exa -1 /testcases/file-names"
stdout = { file = "outputs/names_lines.ansitxt" }
stderr = { empty = true }
status = 0
tags = [ 'oneline' ]
Here’s an explanation of each line:
-
The
[[cmd]]
line marks this test as a cmd check, which can run arbitrary commands. In this case, the commad is exa with some arguments. -
The
name
field is a human-readable description of the feature of exa that’s under test. It gets printed to the screen as tests are run. -
The
shell
field contains the shell script to execute. It should haveexa
in there somewhere. -
The
stdout
field describes the content that exa should print to standard output. In this case, the test asserts that the output of running the program should be identical to the contents of the file. -
The
stderr
field describes the content of standard error. In this case, it asserts that nothing is printed to stderr. -
The
status
field asserts that exa should exit with a status code of 0. -
The
tags
field does not change the test at all, but can be used to filter which tests are run, instead of running all of them each time.