Component-Builder-fork/admin/models/rules/code.php

54 lines
2.5 KiB
PHP

<?php
/**
* @package Joomla.Component.Builder
*
* @created 30th April, 2015
* @author Llewellyn van der Merwe <http://www.joomlacomponentbuilder.com>
* @github Joomla Component Builder <https://github.com/vdm-io/Joomla-Component-Builder>
* @copyright Copyright (C) 2015 Vast Development Method. All rights reserved.
* @license GNU General Public License version 2 or later; see LICENSE.txt
*/
// No direct access to this file
defined('JPATH_PLATFORM') or die;
use Joomla\CMS\Form\Form;
use Joomla\CMS\Form\FormRule;
use Joomla\Registry\Registry;
/**
* Form Rule (Code) class for the Joomla Platform.
*/
class JFormRuleCode extends FormRule
{
/**
* Method to test the value.
*
* @param \SimpleXMLElement $element The SimpleXMLElement object representing the `<field>` tag for the form field object.
* @param mixed $value The form field value to validate.
* @param string $group The field name group control value. This acts as an array container for the field.
* For example if the field has name="foo" and the group value is set to "bar" then the
* full field name would end up being "bar[foo]".
* @param Registry $input An optional Registry object with the entire data set to validate against the entire form.
* @param Form $form The form object for which the field is being tested.
*
* @return boolean True if the value is valid, false otherwise.
*/
public function test(\SimpleXMLElement $element, $value, $group = null, Registry $input = null, Form $form = null)
{
// This removes all validation (is dangerous) but needed to submit code via JCB
return true;
/**
* My idea is to add some kind of validation to improve JCB code (per/language)
*
* So at this time this code validation is used for JavaScript,CSS,HTML and PHP.
* We can see what language is being worked on with the syntax property in the $element. (in JCB)
* What complicates things is the placeholders, of both custom code, component, and view names.
* Ideally we could strip them and then validate the code to being syntactically correct.
* But since some of the placeholders form part of the class/function names and the more, it seems like we are pressed for a much more advance solution.
* If you have any ideas to how we can go about to do this, then please open an issue on github and lets begin. (this is a nice to have, so don't break a leg...)
*/
}
}