Llewellyn commented

Owner

Steps to reproduce the issue

When we are many working on the same project, to setup a bridge between me and my fellow developers to sync our development on agreed project with various checks and balances.

Expected result

Synced development environment. Like git just much more basic... and inside of JCB.

Actual result

The feature does not exist automatically.

Additional comments

I have developed a similar project to sync databases with each-other, so I have ready an authentication tool, and the basic outline to make this work.

Who would be interested in this kind of feature?

### Steps to reproduce the issue When we are many working on the same project, to setup a bridge between me and my fellow developers to sync our development on agreed project with various checks and balances. ### Expected result Synced development environment. Like git just much more basic... and inside of JCB. ### Actual result The feature does not exist automatically. ### Additional comments I have developed a similar project to sync databases with each-other, so I have ready an authentication tool, and the basic outline to make this work. # Who would be interested in this kind of feature?

ro-ot commented

2018-02-19 15:59:28 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Author

Owner

I would like this, we can use it for JCB itself 👍 it will save us so much trouble if it is automated. The packages manager already does most of the work!

I would like this, we can use it for JCB itself :+1: it will save us so much trouble if it is automated. The packages manager already does most of the work!

Llewellyn commented

2018-02-25 22:25:22 +00:00

Author

Owner

I am thinking this is such a huge improvement to JCB and it requires so much work, that I am wondering if we should not make it a paid option.

I have spend so much time on this, it is really very powerful. I think we need to have a chat about this. I mean it only us who responded to this anyway. So why share it?

I am thinking this is such a huge improvement to JCB and it requires so much work, that I am wondering if we should not make it a paid option. I have spend so much time on this, it is really very powerful. I think we need to have a chat about this. I mean it only us who responded to this anyway. So why share it?

👍 1

Flicka2510 commented

2018-02-26 12:39:07 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Author

Owner

Hi I know I am little late to the party, but hey I would really like this feature!

Tell me what kind of security is going to be used here?

Hi I know I am little late to the party, but hey I would really like this feature! Tell me what kind of security is going to be used here?

Llewellyn commented

2018-02-28 03:12:21 +00:00

Author

Owner

Okay at this time, I am moving this feature out of JCB into its own component. I will keep updating this issue. We are planning to make this available as an addon-component.

Llewellyn commented

2018-02-28 14:27:07 +00:00

Author

Owner

@Tony301 I am working on using our own in-house CA system like a browser. So RSA keys will be used to encrypt the communication.

Llewellyn commented

2018-03-08 16:55:35 +00:00

Author

Owner

I am closing this, feature request and placing it on the back burner, for latter.

AlexEdimensionz commented

2018-03-11 13:53:42 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Author

Owner

I think that it's worth paying for this feature. It's a Premium enhancement..

ro-ot commented

2018-03-15 01:54:15 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Author

Owner

I agree this is a premium feature, hope it is not on the back-burner to long.

Connecting JCB's with each-other to sync development on agreed projects? #233

Steps to reproduce the issue

Expected result

Actual result

Additional comments

Who would be interested in this kind of feature?