Merge branch 'master' into update_docs_throttle_http_flags
This commit is contained in:
commit
9e6b7ffc43
@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
|
||||
# Shared key
|
||||
|
||||
A requirement for a migration to run is that the two _before_ and _after_ tables have a shared unique key. This is to elaborate and illustrate on the matter.
|
||||
gh-ost requires for every migration that both the _before_ and _after_ versions of the table share the same unique not-null key columns. This page illustrates this rule.
|
||||
|
||||
### Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
Consider a classic, simple migration. The table is any normal:
|
||||
Consider a simple migration, with a normal table,
|
||||
|
||||
```sql
|
||||
CREATE TABLE tbl (
|
||||
@ -15,54 +15,72 @@ CREATE TABLE tbl (
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
And the migration is a simple `add column ts timestamp`.
|
||||
and the migration `add column ts timestamp`. The _after_ table version would be:
|
||||
|
||||
In such migration there is no change in indexes, and in particular no change to any unique key, and specifically no change to the `PRIMARY KEY`. To run this migration, `gh-ost` would iterate the `tbl` table using the primary key, copy rows from `tbl` to the _ghost_ table `_tbl_gho` by order of `id`, and then apply binlog events onto `_tbl_gho`.
|
||||
```sql
|
||||
CREATE TABLE tbl (
|
||||
id bigint unsigned not null auto_increment,
|
||||
data varchar(255),
|
||||
more_data int,
|
||||
ts timestamp,
|
||||
PRIMARY KEY(id)
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Applying the binlog events assumes the existence of a shared unique key. For example, an `UPDATE` statement in the binary log translate to a `REPLACE` statement which `gh-ost` applies to the _ghost_ table. Such statement expects to add or replace an existing row based on given row data. In particular, it would _replace_ an existing row if a unique key violation is met.
|
||||
(This is also the definition of the _ghost_ table, except that that table would be called `_tbl_gho`).
|
||||
|
||||
So `gh-ost` correlates `tbl` and `_tbl_gho` rows using a unique key. In the above example that would be the `PRIMARY KEY`.
|
||||
In this migration, the _before_ and _after_ versions contain the same unique not-null key (the PRIMARY KEY). To run this migration, `gh-ost` would iterate through the `tbl` table using the primary key, copy rows from `tbl` to the _ghost_ table `_tbl_gho` in primary key order, while also applying the binlog event writes from `tble` onto `_tbl_gho`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Rules
|
||||
The applying of the binlog events is what requires the shared unique key. For example, an `UPDATE` statement to `tbl` translates to a `REPLACE` statement which `gh-ost` applies to `_tbl_gho`. A `REPLACE` statement expects to insert or replace an existing row based on its row's values and the table's unique key constraints. In particular, if inserting that row would result in a unique key violation (e.g., a row with that primary key already exists), it would _replace_ that existing row with the new values.
|
||||
|
||||
There must be a shared set of not-null columns for which there is a unique constraint in both the original table and the migration (_ghost_) table.
|
||||
So `gh-ost` correlates `tbl` and `_tbl_gho` rows one to one using a unique key. In the above example that would be the `PRIMARY KEY`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Interpreting the rules
|
||||
### Interpreting the rule
|
||||
|
||||
The same columns must be covered by a unique key in both tables. This doesn't have to be the `PRIMARY KEY`. This doesn't have to be a key of the same name.
|
||||
The _before_ and _after_ versions of the table share the same unique not-null key, but:
|
||||
- the key doesn't have to be the PRIMARY KEY
|
||||
- the key can have a different name between the _before_ and _after_ versions (e.g., renamed via DROP INDEX and ADD INDEX) so long as it contains the exact same column(s)
|
||||
|
||||
Upon migration, `gh-ost` inspects both the original and _ghost_ table and attempts to find at least one such unique key (or rather, a set of columns) that is shared between the two. Typically this would just be the `PRIMARY KEY`, but sometimes you may change the `PRIMARY KEY` itself, in which case `gh-ost` will look for other options.
|
||||
At the start of the migration, `gh-ost` inspects both the original and _ghost_ table it created, and attempts to find at least one such unique key (or rather, a set of columns) that is shared between the two. Typically this would just be the `PRIMARY KEY`, but some tables don't have primary keys, or sometimes it is the primary key that is being modified by the migration. In these cases `gh-ost` will look for other options.
|
||||
|
||||
`gh-ost` expects unique keys where no `NULL` values are found, i.e. all columns covered by the unique key are defined as `NOT NULL`. This is implicitly true for `PRIMARY KEY`s. If no such key can be found, `gh-ost` bails out. In the event there is no such key, but you happen to _know_ your columns have no `NULL` values even though they're `NULL`-able, you may take responsibility and pass the `--allow-nullable-unique-key`. The migration will run well as long as no `NULL` values are found in the unique key's columns. Any actual `NULL`s may corrupt the migration.
|
||||
`gh-ost` expects unique keys where no `NULL` values are found, i.e. all columns contained in the unique key are defined as `NOT NULL`. This is implicitly true for primary keys. If no such key can be found, `gh-ost` bails out.
|
||||
|
||||
### Examples: allowed and not allowed
|
||||
If the table contains a unique key with nullable columns, but you know your columns contain no `NULL` values, use the `--allow-nullable-unique-key` option. The migration will run well as long as no `NULL` values are found in the unique key's columns. **Any actual `NULL`s may corrupt the migration.**
|
||||
|
||||
### Examples: Allowed and Not Allowed
|
||||
|
||||
```sql
|
||||
create table some_table (
|
||||
id int auto_increment,
|
||||
id int not null auto_increment,
|
||||
ts timestamp,
|
||||
name varchar(128) not null,
|
||||
owner_id int not null,
|
||||
loc_id int,
|
||||
loc_id int not null,
|
||||
primary key(id),
|
||||
unique key name_uidx(name)
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Following are examples of migrations that are _good to run_:
|
||||
Note the two unique, not-null indexes: the primary key and `name_uidx`.
|
||||
|
||||
Allowed migrations:
|
||||
|
||||
- `add column i int`
|
||||
- `add key owner_idx (owner_id)`
|
||||
- `add unique key owner_name_idx(owner_id, name)` - though you need to make sure to not write conflicting rows while this migration runs
|
||||
- `add unique key owner_name_idx (owner_id, name)` - **be careful not to write conflicting rows while this migration runs**
|
||||
- `drop key name_uidx` - `primary key` is shared between the tables
|
||||
- `drop primary key, add primary key(owner_id, loc_id)` - `name_uidx` is shared between the tables and is used for migration
|
||||
- `change id bigint unsigned` - the `'primary key` is used. The change of type still makes the `primary key` workable.
|
||||
- `drop primary key, drop key name_uidx, create primary key(name), create unique key id_uidx(id)` - swapping the two keys. `gh-ost` is still happy because `id` is still unique in both tables. So is `name`.
|
||||
- `drop primary key, add primary key(owner_id, loc_id)` - `name_uidx` is shared between the tables
|
||||
- `change id bigint unsigned not null auto_increment` - the `primary key` changes datatype but not value, and can be used
|
||||
- `drop primary key, drop key name_uidx, add primary key(name), add unique key id_uidx(id)` - swapping the two keys. Either `id` or `name` could be used
|
||||
|
||||
Not allowed:
|
||||
|
||||
- `drop primary key, drop key name_uidx` - the _ghost_ table has no unique key
|
||||
- `drop primary key, drop key name_uidx, create primary key(name, owner_id)` - no shared columns to the unique keys on both tables. Even though `name` exists in the _ghost_ table's `primary key`, it is only part of the key and in itself does not guarantee uniqueness in the _ghost_ table.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Following are examples of migrations that _cannot run_:
|
||||
### Workarounds
|
||||
|
||||
- `drop primary key, drop key name_uidx` - no unique key to _ghost_ table, so clearly cannot run
|
||||
- `drop primary key, drop key name_uidx, create primary key(name, owner_id)` - no shared columns to both tables. Even though `name` exists in the _ghost_ table's `primary key`, it is only part of the key and in itself does not guarantee uniqueness in the _ghost_ table.
|
||||
|
||||
Also, you cannot run a migration on a table that doesn't have some form of `unique key` in the first place, such as `some_table (id int, ts timestamp)`
|
||||
If you need to change your primary key or only not-null unique index to use different columns, you will want to do it as two separate migrations:
|
||||
1. `ADD UNIQUE KEY temp_pk (temp_pk_column,...)`
|
||||
1. `DROP PRIMARY KEY, DROP KEY temp_pk, ADD PRIMARY KEY (temp_pk_column,...)`
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user