- Identifying textual characters sets; converting into specific type when applying dml events
- Refactored `ColumnsList`: introducing `Column` type
- Refactored `unsigned` handling, as part of `Column`
- `Column` type supports `convertArg()`: converting value of argument according to column data type
- DB URI attempts `utf8mb4,utf8,latin1` charsets in that order (first one to be recognized wins)
- Local tests filter by pattern
- Local tests append table schema on failure
- Local tests do not have postpone flag file
- Added character set local tests: `utf8`, `utf8mb4`, `latin1`
- by default gh-ost will not delete an existing socket file
and thus, will fail running if socket file exists. This is the desired behavior.
- The flag --initially-drop-socket-file indicates we take responsibility and wish gh-ost to delete this file on startup
- Cutover would stall after `lock tables` wait-timeout due do waiting on a channel that would never be written to. This has been identified, reproduced, fixed, confirmed.
- Change of table names. Heres the story:
- Because were testing this even while `pt-online-schema-change` is being used in production, the `_tbl_old` naming convention makes for a collision.
- "old" table name is now `_tbl_del`, "del" standing for "delete"
- ghost table name is now `_tbl_gho`
- when issuing `--test-on-replica`, we keep the ghost table around, and were also briefly renaming original table to "old". Well this collides with a potentially existing "old" table on master (one that hasnt been dropped yet).
`--test-on-replica` uses `_tbl_ght` (ghost-test)
- similar problem with `--execute-on-replica`, and in this case the table doesnt stick around; calling it `_tbl_ghr` (ghost-replica)
- changelog table is now `_tbl_ghc` (ghost-changelog)
- To clarify, I dont want to go down the path of creating "old" tables with 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or infinite leading underscored. I think this is very confusing and actually not operations friendly. Its OK that the migration will fail saying "hey, you ALREADY have an old table here, why dont you take care of it first", rather than create _yet_another_ `____tbl_old` table. Were always confused on which table it actually is that gets migrated, which is safe to `drop`, etc.
- just after rowcopy completing, just before cutover, during cutover: marking as point in time _of interest_ so as to increase logging frequency.
