octoleo/lsyncd
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/octoleo/lsyncd.git synced 2025-01-22 14:48:29 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

GlusterFS

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Axel Kittenberger 2010-05-20 21:31:46 +00:00
parent 6dce1044a9
commit d352523c21
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
README
View File

@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ WHEN NOT TO USE:
* File with active file handles (e.g. database files) * File with active file handles (e.g. database files)
* Directories where many changes occur (like mail or news servers) * Directories where many changes occur (like mail or news servers)
In these cases e.g. DRBD (see http://www.linux-ha.org/DRBD) might be better In these cases e.g. DRBD (see http://www.drbd.org/) might be better
for you. for you.
COMPARISONS: COMPARISONS:
@ -58,9 +58,10 @@ COMPARISONS:
This is another interesting idea is to write a daemon that provides a This is another interesting idea is to write a daemon that provides a
shadow file system through fuse. When accessing a file the data is synced shadow file system through fuse. When accessing a file the data is synced
to local file as well as the remote file. Whit this approach inotify could to local file as well as the remote file. Whit this approach inotify could
be replaced. BindFS (see http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/partel/bindfs/) be replaced. GlusterFS does exactly this and more (see http://www.gluster.org).
does this for local mirroring. We discarded this idea because it would BindFS (see http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/partel/bindfs/) does this for local
affect performance of normal operations in a negative way. mirroring. We discarded this idea because it would affect performance of
normal operations in a negative way.
Lsyncd vs. cron: Lsyncd vs. cron: