TODO: more planning

This commit is contained in:
Jay Berkenbilt 2022-02-26 07:39:33 -05:00
parent 78ad4ad180
commit a531418964
1 changed files with 33 additions and 17 deletions

50
TODO
View File

@ -2,15 +2,14 @@
Next
====
Priorities (could be for 10.x)
In order:
* PointerHolder -> shared_ptr
* code formatting
* cmake
* ABI including --json default is latest
* json v2
Priorities for 11:
* cmake
* PointerHolder -> shared_ptr
* ABI
* --json default is latest
Other (do in any order):
Misc
* Get rid of "ugly switch statements" in QUtil.cc -- replace with
@ -41,18 +40,19 @@ big commit to bring everything up to spec. Things to keep in mind:
* clang-format looks promising but is a bit of a moving target; need
to see if its output has been stable over the past few releases
since the first one that can produce code the way I like it
since the first one that can produce code the way I like it. I may
have to require a minimum clang-format version.
* Try to match closely to what I have. At a minimum:
* Ideas here aim for something similar to rust's defaults but with
adjustments to meet my existing style and preferences:
* 80 columns
* 4-space indent (no tabs)
* Probably want to stick with braces on separate lines to minimize
impact, but might consider braces on separate lines for classes
and functions with compact braces for flow control and exception
handling since that seems to be more popular these days
* Compact braces. While this is a big departure from the past and
will create many changes, I have become accustomed to this style
and use it across my projects in other languages these days.
* No "bin packing" -- if arguments (constructor initializers,
function arguments, etc.) don't fit on one line, do one argument
@ -124,11 +124,27 @@ messes up searching for things.
For json v2:
* Make sure it is possible to serialize and deserializes a PDF to JSON
without loading the whole thing into memory. This is substantial. It
means we need sax-style parsing and handling so we can
handle/generate objects as we go. We'll have to be able to keep
track of keys for dictionary error checking. May want to add json to
large file tests.
without loading the whole thing into memory.
* As with a regular PDF, we can load everything into memory at once
except stream data.
* I think we can do this by having the concept of generated values,
which we can make just be strings. We would have a JSON subclass
whose value is a lambda that gets called to generate output. When
we construct the JSON the stream values would be lambda functions
that generate the stream data.
* When we parse the file, we'll have to have a way for the parser to
know that it should create a lambda that reads the data from the
file. I think this means we want something that parses JSON from
an input source. It would have to keep track of the offset and
length of a value from the input source and have a (probably a
lambda that it can call with a path) that would indicate whether
to store the value or whether to create a lambda that retrieves
it. We would have to keep a std::shared_ptr<InputSource> around.
* Add json to the large file tests.
* Resolve differences between information shown in the json format vs.
information shown with options like --check, --list-attachments,