This results in a performance penalty of 1% to 2% when replaceObject
and swapObjects are never called and a somewhat larger penalty if they
are called, but it's worth it to avoid very confusing behavior as
discussed in depth in qpdf#507.
I thought /EFF was supposed to be used as a default for decrypting
embedded file streams, but actually it's supposed to be advice to a
conforming writer about handling new ones. This makes sense since the
findAttachmentStreams code, which is not actually needed, was never
right.
Keep a std::pair internal to the iterators so that operator* can
return a reference and operator-> can work, and each can work without
copying pairs of objects around.
If we ever had an encrypted file with different filters for
attachments and either the /EmbeddedFiles name tree was deep or some
of the file specs didn't have /Type, we would have overlooked those as
attachment streams. The code now properly handles /EmbeddedFiles as a
name tree.
This reverts an incorrect fix to #449 and codes it properly. The real
problem was that we were looking at the local dictionaries rather than
the foreign dictionaries when saving the foreign stream data. In the
case of direct objects, these happened to be the same, but in the case
of indirect objects, the object references could be pointing anywhere
since object numbers don't match up between the old and new files.
Specifically, if a stream had its stream data replaced and had
indirect /Filter or /DecodeParms, it would result in non-silent loss
of data and/or internal error.
It seems better not to compress signature dictionaries. Various PDF
digital signing tools, including Adobe Acrobat Reader DC, do not
compress signature dictionaries.
Table 8.93 "Entries in a signature dictionary" in PDF 1.5 reference
describes that /ByteRange in the signature dictionary shall be used to
describe a digest that does not include the signature value
(/Contents) itself.
The byte ranges cannot be determined if the dictionary is compressed.
When seeing to a position based on a value read from the input, we are
prone to integer overflow (fuzz issue 15442). Seek in two stages to
move the overflow check into the input source code.
