2
2
mirror of https://github.com/octoleo/restic.git synced 2024-11-30 00:33:57 +00:00
restic/internal/repository/index_test.go

499 lines
12 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

package repository_test
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
import (
"bytes"
2018-01-08 19:54:53 +00:00
"math/rand"
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
"sync"
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
"testing"
2017-07-23 12:21:03 +00:00
"github.com/restic/restic/internal/repository"
2017-07-24 15:42:25 +00:00
"github.com/restic/restic/internal/restic"
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest "github.com/restic/restic/internal/test"
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
)
func TestIndexSerialize(t *testing.T) {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
tests := []restic.PackedBlob{}
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
idx := repository.NewIndex()
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
// create 50 packs with 20 blobs each
for i := 0; i < 50; i++ {
packID := restic.NewRandomID()
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
pos := uint(0)
for j := 0; j < 20; j++ {
length := uint(i*100 + j)
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
pb := restic.PackedBlob{
2016-08-31 21:07:50 +00:00
Blob: restic.Blob{
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
BlobHandle: restic.NewRandomBlobHandle(),
Offset: pos,
Length: length,
2016-08-31 21:07:50 +00:00
},
PackID: packID,
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
}
idx.Store(pb)
tests = append(tests, pb)
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
pos += length
}
}
wr := bytes.NewBuffer(nil)
err := idx.Encode(wr)
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.OK(t, err)
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
2020-10-17 07:06:10 +00:00
idx2ID := restic.NewRandomID()
idx2, oldFormat, err := repository.DecodeIndex(wr.Bytes(), idx2ID)
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.OK(t, err)
rtest.Assert(t, idx2 != nil,
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
"nil returned for decoded index")
rtest.Assert(t, !oldFormat, "new index format recognized as old format")
2020-10-17 07:06:10 +00:00
indexID, err := idx2.IDs()
rtest.OK(t, err)
rtest.Equals(t, indexID, restic.IDs{idx2ID})
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
wr2 := bytes.NewBuffer(nil)
err = idx2.Encode(wr2)
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.OK(t, err)
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
for _, testBlob := range tests {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
list := idx.Lookup(testBlob.BlobHandle, nil)
if len(list) != 1 {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
t.Errorf("expected one result for blob %v, got %v: %v", testBlob.ID.Str(), len(list), list)
}
result := list[0]
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
rtest.Equals(t, testBlob, result)
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
list2 := idx2.Lookup(testBlob.BlobHandle, nil)
if len(list2) != 1 {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
t.Errorf("expected one result for blob %v, got %v: %v", testBlob.ID.Str(), len(list2), list2)
}
result2 := list2[0]
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
rtest.Equals(t, testBlob, result2)
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
}
2015-10-12 20:34:12 +00:00
// add more blobs to idx
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
newtests := []restic.PackedBlob{}
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
packID := restic.NewRandomID()
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
pos := uint(0)
for j := 0; j < 10; j++ {
length := uint(i*100 + j)
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
pb := restic.PackedBlob{
2016-08-31 21:07:50 +00:00
Blob: restic.Blob{
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
BlobHandle: restic.NewRandomBlobHandle(),
Offset: pos,
Length: length,
2016-08-31 21:07:50 +00:00
},
PackID: packID,
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
}
idx.Store(pb)
newtests = append(newtests, pb)
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
pos += length
}
}
// finalize; serialize idx, unserialize to idx3
idx.Finalize()
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
wr3 := bytes.NewBuffer(nil)
err = idx.Encode(wr3)
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.OK(t, err)
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.Assert(t, idx.Final(),
2015-10-12 20:34:12 +00:00
"index not final after encoding")
id := restic.NewRandomID()
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.OK(t, idx.SetID(id))
ids, err := idx.IDs()
rtest.OK(t, err)
rtest.Equals(t, restic.IDs{id}, ids)
2015-11-02 17:51:45 +00:00
2020-10-17 07:06:10 +00:00
idx3, oldFormat, err := repository.DecodeIndex(wr3.Bytes(), id)
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.OK(t, err)
rtest.Assert(t, idx3 != nil,
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
"nil returned for decoded index")
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.Assert(t, idx3.Final(),
2015-10-12 20:34:12 +00:00
"decoded index is not final")
rtest.Assert(t, !oldFormat, "new index format recognized as old format")
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
// all new blobs must be in the index
for _, testBlob := range newtests {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
list := idx3.Lookup(testBlob.BlobHandle, nil)
if len(list) != 1 {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
t.Errorf("expected one result for blob %v, got %v: %v", testBlob.ID.Str(), len(list), list)
}
blob := list[0]
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
rtest.Equals(t, testBlob, blob)
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
}
}
func TestIndexSize(t *testing.T) {
idx := repository.NewIndex()
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
packs := 200
blobs := 100
for i := 0; i < packs; i++ {
packID := restic.NewRandomID()
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
pos := uint(0)
for j := 0; j < blobs; j++ {
length := uint(i*100 + j)
2016-08-31 21:07:50 +00:00
idx.Store(restic.PackedBlob{
Blob: restic.Blob{
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
BlobHandle: restic.NewRandomBlobHandle(),
Offset: pos,
Length: length,
2016-08-31 21:07:50 +00:00
},
PackID: packID,
})
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
pos += length
}
}
wr := bytes.NewBuffer(nil)
err := idx.Encode(wr)
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.OK(t, err)
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
t.Logf("Index file size for %d blobs in %d packs is %d", blobs*packs, packs, wr.Len())
}
// example index serialization from doc/Design.rst
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
var docExample = []byte(`
2015-07-25 22:40:00 +00:00
{
"supersedes": [
"ed54ae36197f4745ebc4b54d10e0f623eaaaedd03013eb7ae90df881b7781452"
],
"packs": [
{
"id": "73d04e6125cf3c28a299cc2f3cca3b78ceac396e4fcf9575e34536b26782413c",
"blobs": [
{
"id": "3ec79977ef0cf5de7b08cd12b874cd0f62bbaf7f07f3497a5b1bbcc8cb39b1ce",
"type": "data",
"offset": 0,
"length": 25
},{
"id": "9ccb846e60d90d4eb915848add7aa7ea1e4bbabfc60e573db9f7bfb2789afbae",
"type": "tree",
"offset": 38,
"length": 100
},
{
"id": "d3dc577b4ffd38cc4b32122cabf8655a0223ed22edfd93b353dc0c3f2b0fdf66",
"type": "data",
"offset": 150,
"length": 123
}
]
}
]
}
`)
var docOldExample = []byte(`
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
[ {
"id": "73d04e6125cf3c28a299cc2f3cca3b78ceac396e4fcf9575e34536b26782413c",
"blobs": [
2015-07-25 22:40:00 +00:00
{
"id": "3ec79977ef0cf5de7b08cd12b874cd0f62bbaf7f07f3497a5b1bbcc8cb39b1ce",
"type": "data",
"offset": 0,
"length": 25
},{
"id": "9ccb846e60d90d4eb915848add7aa7ea1e4bbabfc60e573db9f7bfb2789afbae",
"type": "tree",
"offset": 38,
"length": 100
},
{
"id": "d3dc577b4ffd38cc4b32122cabf8655a0223ed22edfd93b353dc0c3f2b0fdf66",
"type": "data",
"offset": 150,
"length": 123
}
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
]
} ]
`)
var exampleTests = []struct {
2016-08-31 18:29:54 +00:00
id, packID restic.ID
2016-08-31 18:58:57 +00:00
tpe restic.BlobType
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
offset, length uint
}{
{
2016-09-04 12:38:18 +00:00
restic.TestParseID("3ec79977ef0cf5de7b08cd12b874cd0f62bbaf7f07f3497a5b1bbcc8cb39b1ce"),
restic.TestParseID("73d04e6125cf3c28a299cc2f3cca3b78ceac396e4fcf9575e34536b26782413c"),
2016-08-31 21:07:50 +00:00
restic.DataBlob, 0, 25,
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
}, {
2016-09-04 12:38:18 +00:00
restic.TestParseID("9ccb846e60d90d4eb915848add7aa7ea1e4bbabfc60e573db9f7bfb2789afbae"),
restic.TestParseID("73d04e6125cf3c28a299cc2f3cca3b78ceac396e4fcf9575e34536b26782413c"),
2016-08-31 21:07:50 +00:00
restic.TreeBlob, 38, 100,
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
}, {
2016-09-04 12:38:18 +00:00
restic.TestParseID("d3dc577b4ffd38cc4b32122cabf8655a0223ed22edfd93b353dc0c3f2b0fdf66"),
restic.TestParseID("73d04e6125cf3c28a299cc2f3cca3b78ceac396e4fcf9575e34536b26782413c"),
2016-08-31 21:07:50 +00:00
restic.DataBlob, 150, 123,
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
},
}
2015-11-01 21:32:28 +00:00
var exampleLookupTest = struct {
2016-08-31 18:29:54 +00:00
packID restic.ID
2016-08-31 18:58:57 +00:00
blobs map[restic.ID]restic.BlobType
2015-11-01 21:32:28 +00:00
}{
2016-09-04 12:38:18 +00:00
restic.TestParseID("73d04e6125cf3c28a299cc2f3cca3b78ceac396e4fcf9575e34536b26782413c"),
2016-08-31 18:58:57 +00:00
map[restic.ID]restic.BlobType{
2016-09-04 12:38:18 +00:00
restic.TestParseID("3ec79977ef0cf5de7b08cd12b874cd0f62bbaf7f07f3497a5b1bbcc8cb39b1ce"): restic.DataBlob,
restic.TestParseID("9ccb846e60d90d4eb915848add7aa7ea1e4bbabfc60e573db9f7bfb2789afbae"): restic.TreeBlob,
restic.TestParseID("d3dc577b4ffd38cc4b32122cabf8655a0223ed22edfd93b353dc0c3f2b0fdf66"): restic.DataBlob,
2015-11-01 21:32:28 +00:00
},
}
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
func TestIndexUnserialize(t *testing.T) {
2016-09-04 12:38:18 +00:00
oldIdx := restic.IDs{restic.TestParseID("ed54ae36197f4745ebc4b54d10e0f623eaaaedd03013eb7ae90df881b7781452")}
2015-07-25 22:40:00 +00:00
2020-10-17 07:06:10 +00:00
idx, oldFormat, err := repository.DecodeIndex(docExample, restic.NewRandomID())
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.OK(t, err)
rtest.Assert(t, !oldFormat, "new index format recognized as old format")
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
for _, test := range exampleTests {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
list := idx.Lookup(restic.BlobHandle{ID: test.id, Type: test.tpe}, nil)
if len(list) != 1 {
t.Errorf("expected one result for blob %v, got %v: %v", test.id.Str(), len(list), list)
}
blob := list[0]
t.Logf("looking for blob %v/%v, got %v", test.tpe, test.id.Str(), blob)
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.Equals(t, test.packID, blob.PackID)
rtest.Equals(t, test.tpe, blob.Type)
rtest.Equals(t, test.offset, blob.Offset)
rtest.Equals(t, test.length, blob.Length)
2015-04-26 15:10:31 +00:00
}
2015-07-25 22:40:00 +00:00
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.Equals(t, oldIdx, idx.Supersedes())
2015-11-01 21:32:28 +00:00
blobs := idx.ListPack(exampleLookupTest.packID)
if len(blobs) != len(exampleLookupTest.blobs) {
t.Fatalf("expected %d blobs in pack, got %d", len(exampleLookupTest.blobs), len(blobs))
}
for _, blob := range blobs {
b, ok := exampleLookupTest.blobs[blob.ID]
if !ok {
2015-11-01 21:32:28 +00:00
t.Errorf("unexpected blob %v found", blob.ID.Str())
}
if blob.Type != b {
t.Errorf("unexpected type for blob %v: want %v, got %v", blob.ID.Str(), b, blob.Type)
}
2015-11-01 21:32:28 +00:00
}
2015-07-25 22:40:00 +00:00
}
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
var (
benchmarkIndexJSON []byte
benchmarkIndexJSONOnce sync.Once
)
func initBenchmarkIndexJSON() {
idx, _ := createRandomIndex(rand.New(rand.NewSource(0)), 200000)
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
var buf bytes.Buffer
err := idx.Encode(&buf)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
benchmarkIndexJSON = buf.Bytes()
}
2017-01-13 20:27:37 +00:00
func BenchmarkDecodeIndex(b *testing.B) {
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
benchmarkIndexJSONOnce.Do(initBenchmarkIndexJSON)
2020-10-17 07:06:10 +00:00
id := restic.NewRandomID()
2017-01-13 20:27:37 +00:00
b.ResetTimer()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
2020-10-17 07:06:10 +00:00
_, _, err := repository.DecodeIndex(benchmarkIndexJSON, id)
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.OK(b, err)
2017-01-13 20:27:37 +00:00
}
}
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
func BenchmarkDecodeIndexParallel(b *testing.B) {
benchmarkIndexJSONOnce.Do(initBenchmarkIndexJSON)
2020-10-17 07:06:10 +00:00
id := restic.NewRandomID()
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
b.ResetTimer()
b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {
for pb.Next() {
2020-10-17 07:06:10 +00:00
_, _, err := repository.DecodeIndex(benchmarkIndexJSON, id)
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
rtest.OK(b, err)
}
})
}
2015-07-25 22:40:00 +00:00
func TestIndexUnserializeOld(t *testing.T) {
2020-10-17 07:06:10 +00:00
idx, oldFormat, err := repository.DecodeIndex(docOldExample, restic.NewRandomID())
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.OK(t, err)
rtest.Assert(t, oldFormat, "old index format recognized as new format")
2015-07-25 22:40:00 +00:00
for _, test := range exampleTests {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
list := idx.Lookup(restic.BlobHandle{ID: test.id, Type: test.tpe}, nil)
if len(list) != 1 {
t.Errorf("expected one result for blob %v, got %v: %v", test.id.Str(), len(list), list)
}
blob := list[0]
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.Equals(t, test.packID, blob.PackID)
rtest.Equals(t, test.tpe, blob.Type)
rtest.Equals(t, test.offset, blob.Offset)
rtest.Equals(t, test.length, blob.Length)
2015-07-25 22:40:00 +00:00
}
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.Equals(t, 0, len(idx.Supersedes()))
}
2015-10-25 14:28:01 +00:00
func TestIndexPacks(t *testing.T) {
idx := repository.NewIndex()
2016-08-31 18:29:54 +00:00
packs := restic.NewIDSet()
2015-10-25 14:28:01 +00:00
for i := 0; i < 20; i++ {
packID := restic.NewRandomID()
2016-08-31 21:07:50 +00:00
idx.Store(restic.PackedBlob{
Blob: restic.Blob{
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
BlobHandle: restic.NewRandomBlobHandle(),
Offset: 0,
Length: 23,
2016-08-31 21:07:50 +00:00
},
PackID: packID,
})
2015-10-25 14:28:01 +00:00
packs.Insert(packID)
}
idxPacks := idx.Packs()
2017-10-02 13:06:39 +00:00
rtest.Assert(t, packs.Equals(idxPacks), "packs in index do not match packs added to index")
2015-10-25 14:28:01 +00:00
}
2018-01-08 19:54:53 +00:00
const maxPackSize = 16 * 1024 * 1024
// This function generates a (insecure) random ID, similar to NewRandomID
func NewRandomTestID(rng *rand.Rand) restic.ID {
id := restic.ID{}
rng.Read(id[:])
return id
}
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
func createRandomIndex(rng *rand.Rand, packfiles int) (idx *repository.Index, lookupBh restic.BlobHandle) {
2018-01-08 19:54:53 +00:00
idx = repository.NewIndex()
// create index with given number of pack files
for i := 0; i < packfiles; i++ {
packID := NewRandomTestID(rng)
var blobs []restic.Blob
2018-01-08 19:54:53 +00:00
offset := 0
for offset < maxPackSize {
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
size := 2000 + rng.Intn(4*1024*1024)
id := NewRandomTestID(rng)
blobs = append(blobs, restic.Blob{
2020-11-05 20:52:34 +00:00
BlobHandle: restic.BlobHandle{
Type: restic.DataBlob,
ID: id,
},
Length: uint(size),
Offset: uint(offset),
2018-01-08 19:54:53 +00:00
})
offset += size
}
idx.StorePack(packID, blobs)
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
if i == 0 {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
lookupBh = restic.BlobHandle{
Type: restic.DataBlob,
ID: blobs[rng.Intn(len(blobs))].ID,
}
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
}
2018-01-08 19:54:53 +00:00
}
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
return idx, lookupBh
2018-01-08 19:54:53 +00:00
}
func BenchmarkIndexHasUnknown(b *testing.B) {
idx, _ := createRandomIndex(rand.New(rand.NewSource(0)), 200000)
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
lookupBh := restic.NewRandomBlobHandle()
2018-01-08 19:54:53 +00:00
b.ResetTimer()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
idx.Has(lookupBh)
2018-01-08 19:54:53 +00:00
}
}
func BenchmarkIndexHasKnown(b *testing.B) {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
idx, lookupBh := createRandomIndex(rand.New(rand.NewSource(0)), 200000)
2018-01-08 19:54:53 +00:00
b.ResetTimer()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
idx.Has(lookupBh)
2018-01-08 19:54:53 +00:00
}
}
func BenchmarkIndexAlloc(b *testing.B) {
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
rng := rand.New(rand.NewSource(0))
b.ReportAllocs()
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
createRandomIndex(rng, 200000)
}
}
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
func BenchmarkIndexAllocParallel(b *testing.B) {
b.ReportAllocs()
b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {
rng := rand.New(rand.NewSource(0))
for pb.Next() {
createRandomIndex(rng, 200000)
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing a float division in every iteration of the inner loop. BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.) Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20: name old time/op new time/op delta PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20) DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18) IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19) IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16) IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20) MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20) LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18) name old speed new speed delta PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19) LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18) LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12) IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal) IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20) SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-05 06:37:34 +00:00
}
})
}
func TestIndexHas(t *testing.T) {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
tests := []restic.PackedBlob{}
idx := repository.NewIndex()
// create 50 packs with 20 blobs each
for i := 0; i < 50; i++ {
packID := restic.NewRandomID()
pos := uint(0)
for j := 0; j < 20; j++ {
length := uint(i*100 + j)
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
pb := restic.PackedBlob{
Blob: restic.Blob{
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
BlobHandle: restic.NewRandomBlobHandle(),
Offset: pos,
Length: length,
},
PackID: packID,
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
}
idx.Store(pb)
tests = append(tests, pb)
pos += length
}
}
for _, testBlob := range tests {
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
rtest.Assert(t, idx.Has(testBlob.BlobHandle), "Index reports not having data blob added to it")
}
2020-11-05 21:18:00 +00:00
rtest.Assert(t, !idx.Has(restic.NewRandomBlobHandle()), "Index reports having a data blob not added to it")
rtest.Assert(t, !idx.Has(restic.BlobHandle{ID: tests[0].ID, Type: restic.TreeBlob}), "Index reports having a tree blob added to it with the same id as a data blob")
}