mirror of
https://github.com/octoleo/restic.git
synced 2024-11-10 15:21:03 +00:00
doc: Describe repository read/write order
This commit is contained in:
parent
07a565e6f7
commit
6f9e20a1bb
@ -30,9 +30,10 @@ All data is stored in a restic repository. A repository is able to store
|
||||
data of several different types, which can later be requested based on
|
||||
an ID. This so-called "storage ID" is the SHA-256 hash of the content of
|
||||
a file. All files in a repository are only written once and never
|
||||
modified afterwards. This allows accessing and even writing to the
|
||||
repository with multiple clients in parallel. Only the ``prune`` operation
|
||||
removes data from the repository.
|
||||
modified afterwards. Writing should occur atomically to prevent concurrent
|
||||
operations from reading incomplete files. This allows accessing and even
|
||||
writing to the repository with multiple clients in parallel. Only the ``prune``
|
||||
operation removes data from the repository.
|
||||
|
||||
Repositories consist of several directories and a top-level file called
|
||||
``config``. For all other files stored in the repository, the name for
|
||||
@ -271,7 +272,7 @@ Keys, Encryption and MAC
|
||||
All data stored by restic in the repository is encrypted with AES-256 in
|
||||
counter mode and authenticated using Poly1305-AES. For encrypting new
|
||||
data first 16 bytes are read from a cryptographically secure
|
||||
pseudorandom number generator as a random nonce. This is used both as
|
||||
pseudo-random number generator as a random nonce. This is used both as
|
||||
the IV for counter mode and the nonce for Poly1305. This operation needs
|
||||
three keys: A 32 byte for AES-256 for encryption, a 16 byte AES key and
|
||||
a 16 byte key for Poly1305. For details see the original paper `The
|
||||
@ -544,6 +545,57 @@ detected, restic creates a new lock, waits, and checks if other locks
|
||||
appeared in the repository. Depending on the type of the other locks and
|
||||
the lock to be created, restic either continues or fails.
|
||||
|
||||
Read and Write Ordering
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
The repository format allows writing (e.g. backup) and reading (e.g. restore)
|
||||
to happen concurrently. As the data for each snapshot in a repository spans
|
||||
multiple files (snapshot, index and packs), it is necessary to follow certain
|
||||
rules regarding the order in which files are read and written. These ordering
|
||||
rules also guarantee that repository modifications always maintain a correct
|
||||
repository even if the client or the storage backend crashes for example due
|
||||
to a power cut or the (network) connection between both is interrupted.
|
||||
|
||||
The correct order to access data in a repository is derived from the following
|
||||
set of invariants that must be maintained at **any time** in a correct
|
||||
repository. *Must* in the following is a strict requirement and will lead to
|
||||
data loss if not followed. *Should* will require steps to fix a repository
|
||||
(e.g. rebuilding the index) if not followed, but should not cause data loss.
|
||||
*existing* means that the referenced data is **durably** stored in the repository.
|
||||
|
||||
- A snapshot *must* only reference an existing tree blob.
|
||||
- A reachable tree blob *must* only reference tree and data blobs that exist
|
||||
(recursively). *Reachable* means that the tree blob is reachable starting from
|
||||
a snapshot.
|
||||
- An index *must* only reference valid blobs in existing packs.
|
||||
- All blobs referenced by a snapshot *should* be listed in an index.
|
||||
|
||||
This leads to the following recommended order to store data in a repository.
|
||||
First, pack files, which contain data and tree blobs, must be written. Then the
|
||||
indexes which reference blobs in these already written pack files. And finally
|
||||
the corresponding snapshots.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that there is no need for a specific write order of data and tree blobs
|
||||
during a backup as the blobs only become referenced once the corresponding
|
||||
snapshot is uploaded.
|
||||
|
||||
Reading data should follow the opposite order compared to writing. Only once a
|
||||
snapshot was written, it is guaranteed that all required data exists in the
|
||||
repository. This especially means that the list of snapshots to read should be
|
||||
collected before loading the repository index. The other way round can lead to
|
||||
a race condition where a recently written snapshot is loaded but not its
|
||||
accompanying index, which results in a failure to access the snapshot's tree
|
||||
blob.
|
||||
|
||||
For removing or rewriting data from a repository the following rules must be
|
||||
followed, which are derived from the above invariants.
|
||||
|
||||
- A client removing data *must* acquire an exclusive lock first to prevent
|
||||
conflicts with other clients.
|
||||
- A pack *must* be removed from the referencing index before it is deleted.
|
||||
- Rewriting a pack *must* write the new pack, update the index (add an updated
|
||||
index and delete the old one) and only then delete the old pack.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Backups and Deduplication
|
||||
=========================
|
||||
|
||||
@ -584,10 +636,10 @@ General assumptions:
|
||||
key management design, it is impossible to securely revoke a leaked key
|
||||
without re-encrypting the whole repository.
|
||||
- Advances in cryptography attacks against the cryptographic primitives used
|
||||
by restic (i.e, AES-256-CTR-Poly1305-AES and SHA-256) have not occurred. Such
|
||||
by restic (i.e., AES-256-CTR-Poly1305-AES and SHA-256) have not occurred. Such
|
||||
advances could render the confidentiality or integrity protections provided
|
||||
by restic useless.
|
||||
- Sufficient advances in computing have not occurred to make bruteforce
|
||||
- Sufficient advances in computing have not occurred to make brute-force
|
||||
attacks against restic's cryptographic protections feasible.
|
||||
|
||||
The restic backup program guarantees the following:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user