2
2
mirror of https://github.com/octoleo/restic.git synced 2024-12-23 11:28:54 +00:00
Commit Graph

34 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Eischer
ec4dfa3c66 Wording: replace further repo occurrences with repository 2022-07-12 20:48:01 +02:00
Lorenz Bausch
d6e3c7f28e
Wording: change repo to repository 2022-07-08 20:05:35 +02:00
Michael Eischer
4faff0debe doc: Describe repository upgrade process 2022-05-09 22:31:30 +02:00
Michael Eischer
dbbeac7174 prune: Add unsafe option to recover from no free space
The new option allows prune to operate with nearly no scratch space by only removing
no longer necessary pack files and first deleting the index before
rebuilding it. By first deleting the index it becomes safe to just
delete no longer necessary pack files. However, as a downside there's
now the risk that the repository becomes inaccessible if prune fails.

To recover from that problem a user might have to manually delete the
repository index and then run (a full) `rebuild-index` again.
2022-04-30 19:21:07 +02:00
Leo R. Lundgren
8ac7519fd5 doc: Clarify and make grouping in forget more noticeable 2022-04-16 01:13:13 +02:00
Jernej Debevc
6e5731bf2f
Fix a typo in the docs 2022-04-01 17:16:55 +02:00
Leo R. Lundgren
cdf478c8f4 doc: More updates to forget documentation and security considerations 2022-03-23 23:12:19 +01:00
Luc Gommans
80969a6347 Update docs according to comments from MichaelEischer in PR #3656 2022-03-23 23:12:19 +01:00
Leo R. Lundgren
676d5d498c doc: Update forget security considerations and thread model 2022-03-23 23:12:19 +01:00
Luc Gommans
9c1d49e312 Document "forget" security considerations and add references
Removing data based on a policy when the attacker had the opportunity to
add data to your repository comes with some considerations. This is
added to the 060_forget.rst documentation.

That document is also updated to reflect that restic now considers
the current system time while running "forget".

References to the security considerations section are added:
- In `restic forget --help`
- In the threat model (design.rst)
- In the (030) setup section where an append-only setup is referenced

A reference is also to be added to the `rest-server` readme's
append-only paragraph (see my fork).

This commit also resolves a typo (amount->number for countable noun),
changes a password length recommendation into the metric that
actually matters when creating passwords (entropy) since I was editing
these doc files anyway, and updates the outdated copyright year in
`conf.py`.

Some wording in 060_forget (line 21..22) was changed to clarify what
"forget" and "prune" do, to try and avoid the apparent misconception
that "forget" does not remove any data.
2022-03-23 23:12:19 +01:00
mattxtaz
6ff32ee4d3 Add missing colon in prune stats output and change padding to 14 chars to align the fields 2022-01-06 21:15:15 +00:00
BUFU
7659790923 fixed --keep-within-X options in example
The order of the words was wrong in the example, i.e. fixed to --keep-within-hourly from --keep-hourly-within.
2021-08-15 19:56:22 +02:00
David le Blanc
326fefcd80 Allow --tag and --keep-tag to match untagged snapshots 2021-08-02 23:06:20 +02:00
Magnus Thor Torfason
74ebc650ab forget: Add --keep-within-hourly (and friends)
Allow keeping hourly/daily/weekly/monthly/yearly snapshots for a given time period.

This adds the following flags/parameters to restic forget:
  --keep-within-hourly duration
  --keep-within-daily duration
  --keep-within-weekly duration
  --keep-within-monthly duration
  --keep-within-yearly duration

Includes following changes:
  - Add tests for --keep-within-hourly (and friends)
  - Add documentation for --keep-within-hourly (and friends)
  - Add changelog for --keep-within-hourly (and friends)
2021-07-24 16:14:43 +00:00
oli-h
23f9cb838d
Sudden find: fix within first "forget" example
I think this was a typo or copy/paste problem when created the doc.
Feel free to merge. Cheers
2021-05-10 08:55:42 +02:00
Craig Younkins
32a84ab3e4 doc: default for --max-unused 2021-04-22 21:12:37 -04:00
Craig Younkins
aa0a7b78a8 doc: prune --max-unused unlimited will still repack metadata
Adding minor clarification to documentation of `prune --max-unused unlimited` to indicate metadata will still be repacked. The referenced PR indicates `max-repack-size` CAN limit metadata repacking.

Ref: https://forum.restic.net/t/max-unused-unlimited-still-repacks/3661
Ref: https://github.com/restic/restic/pull/3228
2021-03-21 13:19:09 -04:00
Leo R. Lundgren
b3c0d2f45b doc: Clarify calendar boundaries for --keep-* options 2020-12-15 12:43:06 +01:00
Alexander Weiss
fd33030556 Use in-memory index to rebuild index in prune 2020-11-06 20:23:30 +01:00
Alexander Neumann
c1a3de4a6e Refactor max-unused calculation, add unlimited option
Add a callback to the PruneOptions struct which calculates the number of
bytes allowed to be unused after prune is done. This way, the logic is
closer to the option parsing code.

Also, add an explicit option `unlimited` for the use case when storage
does not matter but bandwidth and time do. Internally, this sets the
maximum number of unused bytes to MaxUint64.

Rework the documentation slightly so that no more "packs" are
mentioned and it talks about "files" instead.

Make it clear in the documentation that the percentage given to
`--max-unused` is relative to the whole repository size after pruning is
done. If specified, it must be below 100%, otherwise the repository
would contain 100% of unused data, which is pointless.

I had a hard time coming up with the correct formula to calculate the
maximum number of unused bytes based on the number of used bytes. For a
fraction `p` (0 ≤ p < 1), a repo with `u` bytes used, and the number of
unused bytes `x` the following holds:

      x ≤ p * (u+x)
    ⇔ x ≤ p*u + p*x
    ⇔ x - p*x ≤ p*u
    ⇔ x * (1-p) ≤ p*u
    ⇔ x ≤ p/(1-p) * u
2020-11-03 16:42:21 +01:00
Alexander Weiss
7f9a0a5907 Reimplementation of prune 2020-11-03 16:42:21 +01:00
Tony Scelfo
6a607d6ded
--hostname flag is deprecated
Update documentation to follow the deprecation warning "Flag --hostname has been deprecated, use --host" that is given on the latest build(s).
2020-06-29 12:53:57 -06:00
Alexander Neumann
14c90d9e85 Improve example for forget --keep-daily
Following up on https://github.com/restic/restic/pull/2406
2019-11-22 20:44:50 +01:00
8176135
3acc7af310
Small fix to the forget --tag command
As described in #2460
2019-11-03 11:48:56 +13:00
kcthrn
2970e38d92
Fix minor error in doc for forgetting snapshots 2019-03-24 17:59:19 -04:00
plumbeo
3edc723bf0 Update 'restic forget --keep-within' documentation and add changelog entry 2018-11-26 14:27:48 +01:00
Mike Lissner
2caf8edc55 Add warning of the performance of prune
I went pretty loud with this, but I think the performance is bad enough
that it's really worth highlighting, especially since it locks the index
during the prune.
2018-07-31 22:41:40 +02:00
Matt Holt
ee4202f7c3
doc: Clarify multiple forget policies get ORed 2018-05-23 17:28:02 -06:00
Alexander Neumann
375868edcf Add documentation 2018-05-13 12:54:23 +02:00
Alexander Neumann
c3cc5d7cee Update docs 2018-04-28 22:08:11 +02:00
Leo R. Lundgren
8b95b48bae Fix grammar and formatting. 2018-02-14 02:59:47 +01:00
Leo R. Lundgren
71a4ccea71 Document refusal to process empty forget policy. 2018-02-14 02:59:41 +01:00
Leo R. Lundgren
5a9c7c51e6 Fix --keep-* options list formatting. 2018-02-14 02:59:33 +01:00
Jan Niggemann
f5b550191c doc: Refactors the documentation
This commit refactors the documentation according to my proposal in #1273
and the discussion I had with fd0 on IRC.

The bits from the manual that I could not immediately put into the new
structure are contained in manual_rest.rst Anything else is still there,
nothing has been deleted.

I changed the heading markup to follow the convention used in Python’s
Style Guide for documentation, this convention is explained in a comment
at the top of every file.

I also added a paragraph on installing restic on Debian.
2017-10-03 11:21:53 +02:00