octoleo/restic
2
2
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/octoleo/restic.git synced 2024-12-23 11:28:54 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
4,604 Commits 7 Branches 33 Tags 66 MiB
34181b13a2
Commit Graph

653 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
MichaelEischer
34181b13a2
Merge pull request #2328 from MichaelEischer/no-repeated-checks 
Fix duplicate tree checks within `restic check`
 2020-07-22 22:08:02 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
a666a6d576 Add tests and merge indexes in index benchmarks 2020-07-22 21:54:02 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
e388d962a5 Merge final indexes together for faster index access 2020-07-22 21:54:02 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
3b7a3711e6 Add more realistic index benchmarks 
+ reduce test size of BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupParallel
 2020-07-21 07:18:20 +02:00
Michael Eischer
9b0e718852 checker: Test that blob types are not confused 2020-07-20 23:43:47 +02:00
MichaelEischer
82c908871d
Merge pull request #2812 from greatroar/chaining 
Chaining hash table for repository.Index
 2020-07-20 23:29:36 +02:00
Michael Eischer
ddf0b8cd0b checker: Properly distinguish between data and tree blobs 
If a data blob and a tree blob with the same ID (= same content) exist,
then the checker did not report a data or tree blob as unused when the
blob of the other type was still in use.
 2020-07-20 22:58:39 +02:00
Michael Eischer
2d0c138c9b checker: Test that check only decodes trees once 
The `DuplicateTree` flag is necessary to ensure that failures cannot be
swallowed. The old checker implementation ignores errors from LoadTree
if the corresponding tree was already checked.
 2020-07-20 22:51:53 +02:00
Michael Eischer
ef325ffc02 checker: Cleanup error handling code 
This change only moves code around but does not result in any change in
behavior.
 2020-07-20 22:51:53 +02:00
Michael Eischer
7a165f32a9 checker: Traverse trees in depth-first order 
Backups traverse the file tree in depth-first order and saves trees on
the way back up. This results in tree packs filled in a way comparable
to the reverse Polish notation.  In order to check tree blobs in that
order, the treeFilter would have to delay the forwarding of tree nodes
until all children of it are processed which would complicate the
implementation.

Therefore do the next similar thing and traverse the tree in depth-first
order, but process trees already on the way down. The tree blob ids are
added in reverse order to the backlog, which is once again reverted when
removing the ids from the back of the backlog.
 2020-07-20 22:51:53 +02:00
Michael Eischer
36c69e3ca7 checker: Unify blobs, processed trees and referenced blobs map 
The blobRefs map and the processedTrees IDSet are merged to reduce the
memory usage. The blobRefs map now uses separate flags to track blob
usage as data or tree blob. This prevents skipping of trees whose
content is identical to an already processed data blob. A third flag
tracks whether a blob exists or not, which removes the need for the
blobs IDSet.
 2020-07-20 22:51:47 +02:00
Michael Eischer
35d8413639 checker: Remove dead index map 2020-07-20 22:37:31 +02:00
Michael Eischer
c66a0e408c checker: Reduce cost of debug log 
Avoid duplicate allocation of the Subtree list.
 2020-07-20 22:37:31 +02:00
Michael Eischer
70f4c014ef checker: Decode identical tree nodes only once 
Even though the checkTreeWorker skips already processed chunks,
filterTrees did queue the same tree blob on every occurence. This
becomes a serious performance bottleneck for larger number of snapshots
that cover mostly the same directories. Therefore decode a tree blob
exactly once.
 2020-07-20 22:37:31 +02:00
Michael Eischer
f0d8710611 Add benchmark for checker scaling with snapshot count 2020-07-20 22:37:31 +02:00
Alexander Neumann
8074879c5f Remove 'go generate' 2020-07-19 17:28:42 +02:00
greatroar
7bda28f31f Chaining hash table for repository.Index 
These are faster to construct but slower to access. The allocation rate
is halved, the peak memory usage almost halved compared to standard map.

Benchmark results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20:

name                                            old time/op    new time/op    delta
PackerManager-8                                    178ms ± 0%     178ms ± 0%     ~     (p=0.231 n=20+20)
DecodeIndex-8                                      4.54s ± 0%     4.30s ± 0%   -5.20%  (p=0.000 n=18+17)
DecodeIndexParallel-8                              4.54s ± 0%     4.30s ± 0%   -5.22%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
IndexHasUnknown-8                                 44.4ns ± 5%    50.5ns ±11%  +13.82%  (p=0.000 n=19+17)
IndexHasKnown-8                                   48.3ns ± 0%    51.5ns ±12%   +6.68%  (p=0.001 n=16+20)
IndexAlloc-8                                       758ms ± 1%     616ms ± 1%  -18.69%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
IndexAllocParallel-8                               234ms ± 3%     204ms ± 2%  -12.60%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8                     122ns ± 0%     145ns ± 9%  +18.44%  (p=0.000 n=14+20)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8                   369ns ± 2%     429ns ± 8%  +16.27%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8             68.4ns ± 5%    74.9ns ±13%   +9.47%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8            315ns ± 3%     369ns ±11%  +17.14%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/known,indices=5-8        743ns ± 1%     816ns ± 2%   +9.87%  (p=0.000 n=17+17)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/unknown,indices=5-8      238ns ± 1%     260ns ± 2%   +9.14%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/known,indices=10-8      1.01µs ± 3%    1.11µs ± 2%   +9.79%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/unknown,indices=10-8     222ns ± 0%     269ns ± 2%  +20.83%  (p=0.000 n=16+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/known,indices=20-8      1.06µs ± 2%    1.19µs ± 2%  +12.95%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/unknown,indices=20-8     413ns ± 1%     530ns ± 1%  +28.19%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                                  30.2ms ± 1%    30.4ms ± 0%   +0.71%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadTree-8                                         540µs ± 1%     576µs ± 1%   +6.73%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
LoadBlob-8                                        5.64ms ± 0%    5.64ms ± 0%     ~     (p=0.883 n=18+17)
LoadAndDecrypt-8                                  5.93ms ± 0%    5.95ms ± 1%     ~     (p=0.247 n=20+19)
LoadIndex-8                                       25.1ms ± 0%    24.5ms ± 1%   -2.54%  (p=0.000 n=18+17)

name                                            old speed      new speed      delta
PackerManager-8                                  296MB/s ± 0%   296MB/s ± 0%     ~     (p=0.229 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                                 139MB/s ± 1%   138MB/s ± 0%   -0.71%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadBlob-8                                       177MB/s ± 0%   177MB/s ± 0%     ~     (p=0.890 n=18+17)
LoadAndDecrypt-8                                 169MB/s ± 0%   168MB/s ± 1%     ~     (p=0.227 n=20+19)

name                                            old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
PackerManager-8                                   91.8kB ± 0%    91.8kB ± 0%     ~     (p=0.772 n=12+19)
IndexAlloc-8                                       786MB ± 0%     400MB ± 0%  -49.04%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
IndexAllocParallel-8                               786MB ± 0%     401MB ± 0%  -49.04%  (p=0.000 n=19+15)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                                  21.0MB ± 0%    21.0MB ± 0%   +0.00%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)

name                                            old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
PackerManager-8                                    1.41k ± 0%     1.41k ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
IndexAlloc-8                                        977k ± 0%      907k ± 0%   -7.18%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
IndexAllocParallel-8                                977k ± 0%      907k ± 0%   -7.17%  (p=0.000 n=19+15)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                                    73.0 ± 0%      73.0 ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
 2020-07-19 13:58:22 +02:00
greatroar
255ba83c4b Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations 
createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call
It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing
a float division in every iteration of the inner loop.

BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a
parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.)

Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20:

name                                     old time/op    new time/op       delta
PackerManager-8                             178ms ± 0%        178ms ± 0%           ~     (p=0.165 n=20+20)
DecodeIndex-8                              13.6µs ± 2%  4539886.8µs ± 0%  +33293901.38%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
IndexHasUnknown-8                          44.4ns ± 7%       44.4ns ± 5%           ~     (p=0.873 n=20+19)
IndexHasKnown-8                            49.2ns ± 3%       48.3ns ± 0%         -1.86%  (p=0.000 n=20+16)
IndexAlloc-8                                802ms ± 1%        758ms ± 1%         -5.51%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8              124ns ± 1%        122ns ± 0%         -1.41%  (p=0.000 n=20+14)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8            373ns ± 2%        369ns ± 2%         -1.13%  (p=0.001 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8      67.8ns ± 3%       68.4ns ± 5%           ~     (p=0.753 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8     316ns ± 3%        315ns ± 3%           ~     (p=0.846 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                           30.5ms ± 1%       30.2ms ± 1%         -1.09%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadTree-8                                  527µs ± 1%        540µs ± 1%         +2.37%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
LoadBlob-8                                 5.65ms ± 0%       5.64ms ± 0%         -0.21%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
LoadAndDecrypt-8                           7.07ms ± 2%       5.93ms ± 0%        -16.15%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
LoadIndex-8                                32.1ms ± 2%       25.1ms ± 0%        -21.64%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)

name                                     old speed      new speed         delta
PackerManager-8                           296MB/s ± 0%      296MB/s ± 0%           ~     (p=0.159 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                          138MB/s ± 1%      139MB/s ± 1%         +1.10%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadBlob-8                                177MB/s ± 0%      177MB/s ± 0%         +0.21%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
LoadAndDecrypt-8                          141MB/s ± 2%      169MB/s ± 0%        +19.24%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)

name                                     old alloc/op   new alloc/op      delta
PackerManager-8                            91.8kB ± 0%       91.8kB ± 0%           ~     (p=0.826 n=19+12)
IndexAlloc-8                                786MB ± 0%        786MB ± 0%         +0.01%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                           21.0MB ± 0%       21.0MB ± 0%         -0.00%  (p=0.012 n=20+19)

name                                     old allocs/op  new allocs/op     delta
PackerManager-8                             1.41k ± 0%        1.41k ± 0%           ~     (all equal)
IndexAlloc-8                                 977k ± 0%         977k ± 0%         +0.01%  (p=0.022 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                             73.0 ± 0%         73.0 ± 0%           ~     (all equal)
 2020-07-19 13:58:05 +02:00
Lars Lehtonen
9ac90cf5cd
internal/fuse: fix dropped test error 2020-07-12 21:42:31 -07:00
greatroar
58719e1f47 Replace mount's per-file cache by a global LRU cache 2020-07-12 18:27:16 +02:00
greatroar
d42c169458 Fix quadratic file reading in restic mount 2020-07-12 18:27:16 +02:00
greatroar
02bec13ef2 Fix repository_test.BenchmarkSaveAndEncrypt 
The benchmark was actually testing the speed of index lookups.

name              old time/op    new time/op        delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8     101ns ± 2%    31505824ns ± 1%    +31311591.31%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

name              old speed      new speed          delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8  41.7TB/s ± 2%       0.0TB/s ± 1%         -100.00%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

name              old alloc/op   new alloc/op       delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8     1.00B ± 0%  20989508.40B ± 0%  +2098950740.00%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

name              old allocs/op  new allocs/op      delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8      0.00             123.00 ± 0%            +Inf%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)

(The actual speed is ca. 131MiB/s.)
 2020-07-05 17:41:42 +02:00
MichaelEischer
212607dc8a
Merge pull request #2760 from greatroar/backend-benchmark 
Fix backend benchmarks + a micro-optimization
 2020-06-17 23:17:05 +02:00
greatroar
190d8e2f51 Flatten backend.LimitedReadCloser structure 
This inlines the io.LimitedReader into the LimitedReadCloser body to
achieve fewer allocations. Results on linux/amd64:

name                                      old time/op    new time/op    delta
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFile-8           412µs ± 4%     413µs ± 4%    ~     (p=0.634 n=17+17)
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFileOffset-8     455µs ±13%     441µs ±10%    ~     (p=0.072 n=20+18)

name                                      old speed      new speed      delta
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFile-8        10.2GB/s ± 3%  10.2GB/s ± 4%    ~     (p=0.817 n=16+17)
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFileOffset-8  9.25GB/s ±12%  9.54GB/s ± 9%    ~     (p=0.072 n=20+18)

name                                      old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFile-8            888B ± 0%      872B ± 0%  -1.80%  (p=0.000 n=15+15)
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFileOffset-8      888B ± 0%      872B ± 0%  -1.80%  (p=0.000 n=15+15)

name                                      old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFile-8            18.0 ± 0%      17.0 ± 0%  -5.56%  (p=0.000 n=15+15)
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFileOffset-8      18.0 ± 0%      17.0 ± 0%  -5.56%  (p=0.000 n=15+15)
 2020-06-17 13:11:45 +02:00
greatroar
f4cd2a7120 Make backend benchmarks fairer by removing checks 
Checking whether the right data is returned takes up half the time in
some benchmarks. Results for local backend benchmarks on linux/amd64:

name                                      old time/op    new time/op    delta
Backend/BenchmarkLoadFile-8                 4.89ms ± 0%    2.72ms ± 1%   -44.26%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFile-8           936µs ± 6%     439µs ±15%   -53.07%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFileOffset-8     940µs ± 1%     456µs ±10%   -51.50%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Backend/BenchmarkSave-8                     23.9ms ±14%    24.8ms ±41%      ~     (p=0.690 n=5+5)

name                                      old speed      new speed      delta
Backend/BenchmarkLoadFile-8               3.43GB/s ± 0%  6.16GB/s ± 1%   +79.40%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFile-8        4.48GB/s ± 6%  9.63GB/s ±14%  +114.78%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Backend/BenchmarkLoadPartialFileOffset-8  4.46GB/s ± 1%  9.22GB/s ±10%  +106.74%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Backend/BenchmarkSave-8                    706MB/s ±13%   698MB/s ±31%      ~     (p=0.690 n=5+5)
 2020-06-17 13:11:45 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
1361341c58 don't save duplicate packIDs when using internal/repository/Index.Store 2020-06-14 07:56:24 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
ce4a2f4ca6 save packIDs and duplicates separately 
A side remark to the definition of Index.blob:

Another possibility would have been to use:
blob       map[restic.BlobHandle]*indexEntry

This would have led to the following sizes:
key: 32 + 1 = 33 bytes
value: 8 bytes
indexEntry:  8 + 4 + 4 = 16 bytes
each packID: 32 bytes

To save N index entries, we would therefore have needed:
N * OF * (33 + 8) bytes + N * 16 + N * 32 bytes / BP = N * 82 bytes

More precicely, using a pointer instead of a direct entry is the better memory choice if:
OF * 8 bytes + entrysize < OF * entrysize <=> entrysize > 8 bytes * OF/(OF-1)
Under the assumption of OF=1.5, this means using pointers would have been the better choice
if sizeof(indexEntry) > 24 bytes.
 2020-06-14 07:56:21 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
cf979e2b81 make offset and length uint32 2020-06-14 07:50:19 +02:00
Michael Eischer
d92e2c5769 simplify index code 2020-06-14 07:50:19 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
7419844885 add changelog, benchmark, memory calculation 2020-06-14 07:50:15 +02:00
MichaelEischer
dd7b4f54f5
Merge pull request #2709 from greatroar/minio-sha256 
Use Minio's optimized SHA-256
 2020-06-12 23:32:58 +02:00
MichaelEischer
6896c6449b
Merge pull request #2779 from greatroar/archiver-comment 
Fix up comment on archiver.BlobSaver.Save
 2020-06-12 23:04:21 +02:00
MichaelEischer
735a8074d5
Merge pull request #2773 from aawsome/index-uploads+knownblobs 
Fix non-intuitive repo behavior
 2020-06-12 22:41:04 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
70347e95d5 disable index uploads for prune command 
+ modifications of changelog
 2020-06-12 09:24:38 +02:00
greatroar
0fa3091c78 Fix up comment on archiver.BlobSaver.Save 2020-06-11 13:40:30 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
91906911b0 Fix non-intuitive repository behavior 
- The SaveBlob method now checks for duplicates.
- Moves handling of pending blobs to MasterIndex.
  -> also cleans up pending index entries when they are saved in the index
  -> when using SaveBlob no need to care about index any longer
- Always check for full index and save it when storing packs.
  -> removes the need of an index uploader
  -> also removes the verbose "uploaded intermediate index" messages
- The Flush method now also saves the index
- Fix race condition when checking and saving full/non-finalized indexes
 2020-06-11 13:05:23 +02:00
MichaelEischer
6856d1e422
Merge pull request #2749 from aawsome/fix-fullindex 
Change condition for full index
 2020-06-10 20:40:19 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
8c1261ff02 changed condition for full index 2020-06-07 22:00:49 +02:00
MichaelEischer
84475aa3a8
Merge pull request #2730 from greatroar/mount-build-tags 
Simplify build tags for restic mount
 2020-05-23 20:33:43 +02:00
Martin Michlmayr
5cc1760fdf
Fix typos 2020-05-16 14:05:26 +08:00
greatroar
649cbec6c5 Simplify build tags for restic mount 
This command can only be built on Darwin, FreeBSD and Linux
(and if we upgrade bazil.org/fuse, only FreeBSD and Linux:
https://github.com/bazil/fuse/issues/224).

Listing the few supported operating systems explicitly here makes
porting restic to new platforms easier.
 2020-05-12 11:30:41 +02:00
greatroar
9f7cd69f13 Move Index.FindBlob to tests 2020-04-29 10:57:01 +02:00
greatroar
f97a680887 Fix repository benchmarks 
BenchmarkLoad{AndDecrypt,Blob} were spending between 38% and 50% of
their time measuring SHA-256 performance in their checks.
 2020-04-28 07:57:29 +02:00
greatroar
42a3db05b0 Use Minio's optimized SHA-256 
internal/repository benchmarks on an Intel i7-3770k:

name               old speed      new speed       delta
PackerManager-8     209MB/s ± 1%    291MB/s ± 1%  +38.94%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
SaveAndEncrypt-8    112MB/s ± 1%    135MB/s ± 1%  +20.25%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
 2020-04-28 07:57:18 +02:00
greatroar
e7d7b85d59 Merge Repository.{LoadBlob,loadBlob} 
Pushing the allocation logic down into the former loadBlob body means
that fewer allocations have to be performed:

name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
LoadTree-8           478µs ± 1%     481µs ± 2%    ~     (p=0.315 n=9+10)
LoadBlob-8          11.6ms ± 1%    11.6ms ± 2%    ~     (p=0.393 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8    13.3ms ± 3%    13.3ms ± 3%    ~     (p=0.905 n=10+9)
LoadIndex-8         33.6ms ± 2%    33.2ms ± 1%  -1.15%  (p=0.028 n=10+9)

name              old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
LoadTree-8          41.2kB ± 0%    41.1kB ± 0%  -0.23%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadBlob-8          2.28kB ± 0%    2.18kB ± 0%  -4.21%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8    2.10MB ± 0%    2.10MB ± 0%    ~     (all equal)
LoadIndex-8         5.22MB ± 0%    5.22MB ± 0%    ~     (p=0.631 n=10+10)

name              old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
LoadTree-8             652 ± 0%       651 ± 0%  -0.15%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadBlob-8            24.0 ± 0%      23.0 ± 0%  -4.17%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8      30.0 ± 0%      30.0 ± 0%    ~     (all equal)
LoadIndex-8          30.2k ± 0%     30.2k ± 0%    ~     (p=0.610 n=10+10)

name              old speed      new speed      delta
LoadBlob-8        86.4MB/s ± 1%  85.9MB/s ± 2%    ~     (p=0.393 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8  75.4MB/s ± 3%  75.4MB/s ± 3%    ~     (p=0.858 n=10+9)
 2020-04-23 10:04:20 +02:00
greatroar
be5a0ff59f Centralize buffer allocation and size checking in Repository.LoadBlob 
Benchmark results for internal/repository:

name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
LoadTree-8           479µs ± 2%     478µs ± 1%   ~     (p=0.780 n=10+9)
LoadBlob-8          11.6ms ± 2%    11.6ms ± 1%   ~     (p=0.631 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8    13.2ms ± 2%    13.3ms ± 3%   ~     (p=0.631 n=10+10)

name              old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
LoadTree-8          41.2kB ± 0%    41.2kB ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
LoadBlob-8          2.28kB ± 0%    2.28kB ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
LoadAndDecrypt-8    2.10MB ± 0%    2.10MB ± 0%   ~     (all equal)

name              old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
LoadTree-8             652 ± 0%       652 ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
LoadBlob-8            24.0 ± 0%      24.0 ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
LoadAndDecrypt-8      30.0 ± 0%      30.0 ± 0%   ~     (all equal)

name              old speed      new speed      delta
LoadBlob-8        86.2MB/s ± 2%  86.4MB/s ± 1%   ~     (p=0.594 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8  75.7MB/s ± 2%  75.4MB/s ± 3%   ~     (p=0.617 n=10+10)
 2020-04-23 10:04:20 +02:00
MichaelEischer
4f00564574
Merge pull request #2621 from greatroar/fixes 
Some small fixes
 2020-04-18 18:07:08 +02:00
MichaelEischer
f77477129f
Merge pull request #2584 from greatroar/mount-cache-uid-gid 
Cache uid and gid for top directories in internal/fuse
 2020-04-18 17:45:14 +02:00
greatroar
2e31120f89 Remove unused argument to restic.fakeFile 2020-04-18 17:40:13 +02:00
greatroar
8fb2c0d3c1 Typo in crypto test name 2020-04-18 17:39:06 +02:00