octoleo/restic
2
2
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/octoleo/restic.git synced 2024-11-30 00:33:57 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
4,732 Commits 7 Branches 33 Tags 66 MiB
d19f05c960
Commit Graph

114 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Eischer
2f8335554c Remove a few unused variables 2020-09-05 10:06:23 +02:00
Michael Eischer
f4b9544ab2 prune: Add test that repack aborts on wrong blob 2020-08-16 11:34:01 +02:00
Michael Eischer
367449dede prune: Reduce memory allocations while repacking 
The slicing operator `slice[low:high]` default to 0 for the lower bound and
len(slice) for the upper bound when either or both are not specified.
Fix the code to use `cap(slice)` to check for the slice capacity.
 2020-08-16 11:34:01 +02:00
Michael Eischer
7042bafea5 prune: Abort repacking when a pack contains a wrong blob 
If a blob in a pack file can be decrypted successfully but contains data
that results in a different hash than stated in the header pack, then
abort repacking. As both the pack header and the blob are
cryptographically verified this either means than a malicious entity
tampered with the backup or indicates hardware problems on the client.
prune should fail with an error in both cases.
 2020-08-16 11:34:01 +02:00
aawsome
0fed6a8dfc
Use "pack file" instead of "data file" (#2885) 
- changed variable names, especially changed DataFile into PackFile
- changed in some comments
- always use "pack file" in docu
 2020-08-16 11:16:38 +02:00
MichaelEischer
eca0f0ad24
Merge pull request #2863 from aawsome/index-no-duplicates 
Don't save exact duplicates in merged index
 2020-08-08 18:24:14 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
b112533812 Don't save exact duplicates when merging indexes 2020-08-05 06:32:02 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
5e63294355 Add benchmark MasterIndexAlloc 2020-08-05 06:32:02 +02:00
Michael Eischer
05116e4787 prune: Cleanup progress bar handling while repacking 2020-08-03 19:32:46 +02:00
Alexander Neumann
2580eef2aa
Merge pull request #2318 from classmarkets/2175-named-keys 
Allow specifying user and host when adding keys
 2020-08-01 13:06:31 +02:00
Michael Eischer
c847aace35 Rename Index interface to MasterIndex 
The interface is now only implemented by repository.MasterIndex.
 2020-07-25 21:19:46 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
9d1fb94c6c make Lookup() return all blobs 
+ simplify syntax
 2020-07-25 21:18:34 +02:00
greatroar
309598c237 Simplify sortCachedPacksFirst test in internal/repository 
The test now uses the fact that the sort is stable. It's not guaranteed
to be, but the test is cleaner and more exhaustive. sortCachedPacksFirst
no longer needs a return value.
 2020-07-25 12:12:59 +02:00
greatroar
03d23e6faa Speed up blob sorting in internal/repository 
name                    old time/op    new time/op    delta
SortCachedPacksFirst-8     208µs ± 3%     186µs ± 3%  -10.74%  (p=0.000 n=10+8)

name                    old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
SortCachedPacksFirst-8     213kB ± 0%     139kB ± 0%  -34.62%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

name                    old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
SortCachedPacksFirst-8     1.03k ± 0%     1.03k ± 0%   -0.19%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
 2020-07-25 12:12:59 +02:00
greatroar
b10acd2af7 Test and benchmark blob sorting in internal/repository 2020-07-25 12:12:58 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
a666a6d576 Add tests and merge indexes in index benchmarks 2020-07-22 21:54:02 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
e388d962a5 Merge final indexes together for faster index access 2020-07-22 21:54:02 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
3b7a3711e6 Add more realistic index benchmarks 
+ reduce test size of BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupParallel
 2020-07-21 07:18:20 +02:00
greatroar
7bda28f31f Chaining hash table for repository.Index 
These are faster to construct but slower to access. The allocation rate
is halved, the peak memory usage almost halved compared to standard map.

Benchmark results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20:

name                                            old time/op    new time/op    delta
PackerManager-8                                    178ms ± 0%     178ms ± 0%     ~     (p=0.231 n=20+20)
DecodeIndex-8                                      4.54s ± 0%     4.30s ± 0%   -5.20%  (p=0.000 n=18+17)
DecodeIndexParallel-8                              4.54s ± 0%     4.30s ± 0%   -5.22%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
IndexHasUnknown-8                                 44.4ns ± 5%    50.5ns ±11%  +13.82%  (p=0.000 n=19+17)
IndexHasKnown-8                                   48.3ns ± 0%    51.5ns ±12%   +6.68%  (p=0.001 n=16+20)
IndexAlloc-8                                       758ms ± 1%     616ms ± 1%  -18.69%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
IndexAllocParallel-8                               234ms ± 3%     204ms ± 2%  -12.60%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8                     122ns ± 0%     145ns ± 9%  +18.44%  (p=0.000 n=14+20)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8                   369ns ± 2%     429ns ± 8%  +16.27%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8             68.4ns ± 5%    74.9ns ±13%   +9.47%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8            315ns ± 3%     369ns ±11%  +17.14%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/known,indices=5-8        743ns ± 1%     816ns ± 2%   +9.87%  (p=0.000 n=17+17)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/unknown,indices=5-8      238ns ± 1%     260ns ± 2%   +9.14%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/known,indices=10-8      1.01µs ± 3%    1.11µs ± 2%   +9.79%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/unknown,indices=10-8     222ns ± 0%     269ns ± 2%  +20.83%  (p=0.000 n=16+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/known,indices=20-8      1.06µs ± 2%    1.19µs ± 2%  +12.95%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/unknown,indices=20-8     413ns ± 1%     530ns ± 1%  +28.19%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                                  30.2ms ± 1%    30.4ms ± 0%   +0.71%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadTree-8                                         540µs ± 1%     576µs ± 1%   +6.73%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
LoadBlob-8                                        5.64ms ± 0%    5.64ms ± 0%     ~     (p=0.883 n=18+17)
LoadAndDecrypt-8                                  5.93ms ± 0%    5.95ms ± 1%     ~     (p=0.247 n=20+19)
LoadIndex-8                                       25.1ms ± 0%    24.5ms ± 1%   -2.54%  (p=0.000 n=18+17)

name                                            old speed      new speed      delta
PackerManager-8                                  296MB/s ± 0%   296MB/s ± 0%     ~     (p=0.229 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                                 139MB/s ± 1%   138MB/s ± 0%   -0.71%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadBlob-8                                       177MB/s ± 0%   177MB/s ± 0%     ~     (p=0.890 n=18+17)
LoadAndDecrypt-8                                 169MB/s ± 0%   168MB/s ± 1%     ~     (p=0.227 n=20+19)

name                                            old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
PackerManager-8                                   91.8kB ± 0%    91.8kB ± 0%     ~     (p=0.772 n=12+19)
IndexAlloc-8                                       786MB ± 0%     400MB ± 0%  -49.04%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
IndexAllocParallel-8                               786MB ± 0%     401MB ± 0%  -49.04%  (p=0.000 n=19+15)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                                  21.0MB ± 0%    21.0MB ± 0%   +0.00%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)

name                                            old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
PackerManager-8                                    1.41k ± 0%     1.41k ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
IndexAlloc-8                                        977k ± 0%      907k ± 0%   -7.18%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
IndexAllocParallel-8                                977k ± 0%      907k ± 0%   -7.17%  (p=0.000 n=19+15)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                                    73.0 ± 0%      73.0 ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
 2020-07-19 13:58:22 +02:00
greatroar
255ba83c4b Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations 
createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call
It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing
a float division in every iteration of the inner loop.

BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a
parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.)

Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20:

name                                     old time/op    new time/op       delta
PackerManager-8                             178ms ± 0%        178ms ± 0%           ~     (p=0.165 n=20+20)
DecodeIndex-8                              13.6µs ± 2%  4539886.8µs ± 0%  +33293901.38%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
IndexHasUnknown-8                          44.4ns ± 7%       44.4ns ± 5%           ~     (p=0.873 n=20+19)
IndexHasKnown-8                            49.2ns ± 3%       48.3ns ± 0%         -1.86%  (p=0.000 n=20+16)
IndexAlloc-8                                802ms ± 1%        758ms ± 1%         -5.51%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8              124ns ± 1%        122ns ± 0%         -1.41%  (p=0.000 n=20+14)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8            373ns ± 2%        369ns ± 2%         -1.13%  (p=0.001 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8      67.8ns ± 3%       68.4ns ± 5%           ~     (p=0.753 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8     316ns ± 3%        315ns ± 3%           ~     (p=0.846 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                           30.5ms ± 1%       30.2ms ± 1%         -1.09%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadTree-8                                  527µs ± 1%        540µs ± 1%         +2.37%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
LoadBlob-8                                 5.65ms ± 0%       5.64ms ± 0%         -0.21%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
LoadAndDecrypt-8                           7.07ms ± 2%       5.93ms ± 0%        -16.15%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
LoadIndex-8                                32.1ms ± 2%       25.1ms ± 0%        -21.64%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)

name                                     old speed      new speed         delta
PackerManager-8                           296MB/s ± 0%      296MB/s ± 0%           ~     (p=0.159 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                          138MB/s ± 1%      139MB/s ± 1%         +1.10%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadBlob-8                                177MB/s ± 0%      177MB/s ± 0%         +0.21%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
LoadAndDecrypt-8                          141MB/s ± 2%      169MB/s ± 0%        +19.24%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)

name                                     old alloc/op   new alloc/op      delta
PackerManager-8                            91.8kB ± 0%       91.8kB ± 0%           ~     (p=0.826 n=19+12)
IndexAlloc-8                                786MB ± 0%        786MB ± 0%         +0.01%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                           21.0MB ± 0%       21.0MB ± 0%         -0.00%  (p=0.012 n=20+19)

name                                     old allocs/op  new allocs/op     delta
PackerManager-8                             1.41k ± 0%        1.41k ± 0%           ~     (all equal)
IndexAlloc-8                                 977k ± 0%         977k ± 0%         +0.01%  (p=0.022 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                             73.0 ± 0%         73.0 ± 0%           ~     (all equal)
 2020-07-19 13:58:05 +02:00
greatroar
02bec13ef2 Fix repository_test.BenchmarkSaveAndEncrypt 
The benchmark was actually testing the speed of index lookups.

name              old time/op    new time/op        delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8     101ns ± 2%    31505824ns ± 1%    +31311591.31%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

name              old speed      new speed          delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8  41.7TB/s ± 2%       0.0TB/s ± 1%         -100.00%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

name              old alloc/op   new alloc/op       delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8     1.00B ± 0%  20989508.40B ± 0%  +2098950740.00%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

name              old allocs/op  new allocs/op      delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8      0.00             123.00 ± 0%            +Inf%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)

(The actual speed is ca. 131MiB/s.)
 2020-07-05 17:41:42 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
1361341c58 don't save duplicate packIDs when using internal/repository/Index.Store 2020-06-14 07:56:24 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
ce4a2f4ca6 save packIDs and duplicates separately 
A side remark to the definition of Index.blob:

Another possibility would have been to use:
blob       map[restic.BlobHandle]*indexEntry

This would have led to the following sizes:
key: 32 + 1 = 33 bytes
value: 8 bytes
indexEntry:  8 + 4 + 4 = 16 bytes
each packID: 32 bytes

To save N index entries, we would therefore have needed:
N * OF * (33 + 8) bytes + N * 16 + N * 32 bytes / BP = N * 82 bytes

More precicely, using a pointer instead of a direct entry is the better memory choice if:
OF * 8 bytes + entrysize < OF * entrysize <=> entrysize > 8 bytes * OF/(OF-1)
Under the assumption of OF=1.5, this means using pointers would have been the better choice
if sizeof(indexEntry) > 24 bytes.
 2020-06-14 07:56:21 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
cf979e2b81 make offset and length uint32 2020-06-14 07:50:19 +02:00
Michael Eischer
d92e2c5769 simplify index code 2020-06-14 07:50:19 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
7419844885 add changelog, benchmark, memory calculation 2020-06-14 07:50:15 +02:00
MichaelEischer
dd7b4f54f5
Merge pull request #2709 from greatroar/minio-sha256 
Use Minio's optimized SHA-256
 2020-06-12 23:32:58 +02:00
MichaelEischer
735a8074d5
Merge pull request #2773 from aawsome/index-uploads+knownblobs 
Fix non-intuitive repo behavior
 2020-06-12 22:41:04 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
70347e95d5 disable index uploads for prune command 
+ modifications of changelog
 2020-06-12 09:24:38 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
91906911b0 Fix non-intuitive repository behavior 
- The SaveBlob method now checks for duplicates.
- Moves handling of pending blobs to MasterIndex.
  -> also cleans up pending index entries when they are saved in the index
  -> when using SaveBlob no need to care about index any longer
- Always check for full index and save it when storing packs.
  -> removes the need of an index uploader
  -> also removes the verbose "uploaded intermediate index" messages
- The Flush method now also saves the index
- Fix race condition when checking and saving full/non-finalized indexes
 2020-06-11 13:05:23 +02:00
MichaelEischer
6856d1e422
Merge pull request #2749 from aawsome/fix-fullindex 
Change condition for full index
 2020-06-10 20:40:19 +02:00
Alexander Weiss
8c1261ff02 changed condition for full index 2020-06-07 22:00:49 +02:00
greatroar
f97a680887 Fix repository benchmarks 
BenchmarkLoad{AndDecrypt,Blob} were spending between 38% and 50% of
their time measuring SHA-256 performance in their checks.
 2020-04-28 07:57:29 +02:00
greatroar
42a3db05b0 Use Minio's optimized SHA-256 
internal/repository benchmarks on an Intel i7-3770k:

name               old speed      new speed       delta
PackerManager-8     209MB/s ± 1%    291MB/s ± 1%  +38.94%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
SaveAndEncrypt-8    112MB/s ± 1%    135MB/s ± 1%  +20.25%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
 2020-04-28 07:57:18 +02:00
greatroar
e7d7b85d59 Merge Repository.{LoadBlob,loadBlob} 
Pushing the allocation logic down into the former loadBlob body means
that fewer allocations have to be performed:

name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
LoadTree-8           478µs ± 1%     481µs ± 2%    ~     (p=0.315 n=9+10)
LoadBlob-8          11.6ms ± 1%    11.6ms ± 2%    ~     (p=0.393 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8    13.3ms ± 3%    13.3ms ± 3%    ~     (p=0.905 n=10+9)
LoadIndex-8         33.6ms ± 2%    33.2ms ± 1%  -1.15%  (p=0.028 n=10+9)

name              old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
LoadTree-8          41.2kB ± 0%    41.1kB ± 0%  -0.23%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadBlob-8          2.28kB ± 0%    2.18kB ± 0%  -4.21%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8    2.10MB ± 0%    2.10MB ± 0%    ~     (all equal)
LoadIndex-8         5.22MB ± 0%    5.22MB ± 0%    ~     (p=0.631 n=10+10)

name              old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
LoadTree-8             652 ± 0%       651 ± 0%  -0.15%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadBlob-8            24.0 ± 0%      23.0 ± 0%  -4.17%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8      30.0 ± 0%      30.0 ± 0%    ~     (all equal)
LoadIndex-8          30.2k ± 0%     30.2k ± 0%    ~     (p=0.610 n=10+10)

name              old speed      new speed      delta
LoadBlob-8        86.4MB/s ± 1%  85.9MB/s ± 2%    ~     (p=0.393 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8  75.4MB/s ± 3%  75.4MB/s ± 3%    ~     (p=0.858 n=10+9)
 2020-04-23 10:04:20 +02:00
greatroar
be5a0ff59f Centralize buffer allocation and size checking in Repository.LoadBlob 
Benchmark results for internal/repository:

name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
LoadTree-8           479µs ± 2%     478µs ± 1%   ~     (p=0.780 n=10+9)
LoadBlob-8          11.6ms ± 2%    11.6ms ± 1%   ~     (p=0.631 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8    13.2ms ± 2%    13.3ms ± 3%   ~     (p=0.631 n=10+10)

name              old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
LoadTree-8          41.2kB ± 0%    41.2kB ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
LoadBlob-8          2.28kB ± 0%    2.28kB ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
LoadAndDecrypt-8    2.10MB ± 0%    2.10MB ± 0%   ~     (all equal)

name              old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
LoadTree-8             652 ± 0%       652 ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
LoadBlob-8            24.0 ± 0%      24.0 ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
LoadAndDecrypt-8      30.0 ± 0%      30.0 ± 0%   ~     (all equal)

name              old speed      new speed      delta
LoadBlob-8        86.2MB/s ± 2%  86.4MB/s ± 1%   ~     (p=0.594 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8  75.7MB/s ± 2%  75.4MB/s ± 3%   ~     (p=0.617 n=10+10)
 2020-04-23 10:04:20 +02:00
MichaelEischer
16710454f4
Merge pull request #2628 from MichaelEischer/one-element-pack-lists 
cache: Don't sort one element pack lists
 2020-04-18 17:09:06 +02:00
MichaelEischer
a1352906e2
Merge pull request #2622 from greatroar/optimize-packer-manager 
Fix PackerManager benchmark and optimize hashing.Writer
 2020-04-18 12:46:34 +02:00
Peter Schultz
90fc639a67 Allow specifying user and host when adding keys 
The username and hostname for new keys can be specified with the new
--user and --host flags, respectively. The flags are used only by the
`key add` command and are otherwise ignored.

This allows adding keys with for a desired user and host without having
to run restic as that particular user on that particular host, making
automated key management easier.

Co-authored-by: James TD Smith <ahktenzero@mohorovi.cc>
 2020-03-23 13:11:10 +01:00
rawtaz
7d9300efca
Merge pull request #2637 from greatroar/unused 
Remove Go 1.5 compatibility code
 2020-03-18 22:22:15 +01:00
greatroar
4de12bf593 Remove restic.RandReader 
math/rand.Rand has implemented Reader since Go 1.6. The repacking tests
are not deterministic, but they weren't before, either.
 2020-03-09 10:00:28 +01:00
Michael Eischer
b46cc6d57e repository: Don't sort one element pack lists 
When loading a blob, restic first looks up pack files containing the
blob. To avoid unnecessary work an already cached pack file is preferred.
However, if there is only a single pack file to choose from (which is
the normal case) sorting the one-element list won't change anything.
Therefore avoid the unnecessary cache check in that case.
 2020-03-07 10:26:06 +01:00
greatroar
b592614061 Improve PackerManager benchmark 
The previous benchmark spent much of its time allocating RNGs and
generating too many random numbers. It now spends 90% of its time
hashing and half of the rest writing to files.

name             old time/op    new time/op    delta
PackerManager-8     319ms ± 1%     247ms ± 1%  -22.48%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)

name             old speed      new speed      delta
PackerManager-8   143MB/s ± 1%   213MB/s ± 1%  +48.63%  (p=0.000 n=10+18)

name             old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
PackerManager-8     635kB ± 0%      92kB ± 0%  -85.48%  (p=0.000 n=10+19)

name             old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
PackerManager-8     1.64k ± 0%     1.43k ± 0%  -12.76%  (p=0.000 n=10+20)
 2020-03-05 22:30:03 +01:00
greatroar
b7c3039eb2 Remove Go 1.5 compatibility code from PackerManager benchmark 
This alone is enough to speed up the benchmark by ~10%.
 2020-03-05 22:29:06 +01:00
Alexander Neumann
c50f91b7f9
Merge pull request #2602 from greatroar/no-bufpool 
Remove sync.Pool from internal/repository
 2020-03-01 10:50:57 +01:00
greatroar
8526cc6647 Remove sync.Pool from internal/repository 
The pool was used improperly, causing more allocations to be
performed than without it.

name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8    36.8ms ± 2%    36.9ms ± 2%    ~     (p=0.218 n=10+10)

name              old speed      new speed      delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8   114MB/s ± 2%   114MB/s ± 2%    ~     (p=0.218 n=10+10)

name              old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8    21.1MB ± 0%    21.0MB ± 0%  -0.44%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

name              old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8      79.0 ± 0%      77.0 ± 0%  -2.53%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
 2020-02-29 17:54:46 +01:00
greatroar
4f6fd9fb98 Remove remnant of Go 1.9 compatibility code from tests 2020-02-26 22:23:38 +01:00
rawtaz
d8da9c4401
Merge pull request #2577 from alrs/fix-internal-errs 
internal: Fix code and test dropped errors
 2020-02-12 23:41:54 +01:00
Lars Lehtonen
fea835b4e2
internal/repository: fix dropped test error 2020-02-12 13:33:54 -08:00
Alexander Bruyako
38ddfbc4d3 simpler error return 2020-01-27 18:41:46 +03:00