octoleo/syncthing
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/octoleo/syncthing.git synced 2025-01-02 22:50:18 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
main
syncthing/lib/protocol/conflict_test.go

31 lines
972 B
Go
Raw Permalink Normal View History

refactor: use modern Protobuf encoder (#9817) At a high level, this is what I've done and why: - I'm moving the protobuf generation for the `protocol`, `discovery` and `db` packages to the modern alternatives, and using `buf` to generate because it's nice and simple. - After trying various approaches on how to integrate the new types with the existing code, I opted for splitting off our own data model types from the on-the-wire generated types. This means we can have a `FileInfo` type with nicer ergonomics and lots of methods, while the protobuf generated type stays clean and close to the wire protocol. It does mean copying between the two when required, which certainly adds a small amount of inefficiency. If we want to walk this back in the future and use the raw generated type throughout, that's possible, this however makes the refactor smaller (!) as it doesn't change everything about the type for everyone at the same time. - I have simply removed in cold blood a significant number of old database migrations. These depended on previous generations of generated messages of various kinds and were annoying to support in the new fashion. The oldest supported database version now is the one from Syncthing 1.9.0 from Sep 7, 2020. - I changed config structs to be regular manually defined structs. For the sake of discussion, some things I tried that turned out not to work... ### Embedding / wrapping Embedding the protobuf generated structs in our existing types as a data container and keeping our methods and stuff: ``` package protocol type FileInfo struct { *generated.FileInfo } ``` This generates a lot of problems because the internal shape of the generated struct is quite different (different names, different types, more pointers), because initializing it doesn't work like you'd expect (i.e., you end up with an embedded nil pointer and a panic), and because the types of child types don't get wrapped. That is, even if we also have a similar wrapper around a `Vector`, that's not the type you get when accessing `someFileInfo.Version`, you get the `*generated.Vector` that doesn't have methods, etc. ### Aliasing ``` package protocol type FileInfo = generated.FileInfo ``` Doesn't help because you can't attach methods to it, plus all the above. ### Generating the types into the target package like we do now and attaching methods This fails because of the different shape of the generated type (as in the embedding case above) plus the generated struct already has a bunch of methods that we can't necessarily override properly (like `String()` and a bunch of getters). ### Methods to functions I considered just moving all the methods we attach to functions in a specific package, so that for example ``` package protocol func (f FileInfo) Equal(other FileInfo) bool ``` would become ``` package fileinfos func Equal(a, b *generated.FileInfo) bool ``` and this would mostly work, but becomes quite verbose and cumbersome, and somewhat limits discoverability (you can't see what methods are available on the type in auto completions, etc). In the end I did this in some cases, like in the database layer where a lot of things like `func (fv *FileVersion) IsEmpty() bool` becomes `func fvIsEmpty(fv *generated.FileVersion)` because they were anyway just internal methods. Fixes #8247
2024-12-01 15:50:17 +00:00
// Copyright (C) 2015 The Syncthing Authors.
//
// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
// License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this file,
// You can obtain one at https://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
Base for better conflict resolution
2015-07-21 13:12:19 +00:00
package protocol
refactor: use modern Protobuf encoder (#9817) At a high level, this is what I've done and why: - I'm moving the protobuf generation for the `protocol`, `discovery` and `db` packages to the modern alternatives, and using `buf` to generate because it's nice and simple. - After trying various approaches on how to integrate the new types with the existing code, I opted for splitting off our own data model types from the on-the-wire generated types. This means we can have a `FileInfo` type with nicer ergonomics and lots of methods, while the protobuf generated type stays clean and close to the wire protocol. It does mean copying between the two when required, which certainly adds a small amount of inefficiency. If we want to walk this back in the future and use the raw generated type throughout, that's possible, this however makes the refactor smaller (!) as it doesn't change everything about the type for everyone at the same time. - I have simply removed in cold blood a significant number of old database migrations. These depended on previous generations of generated messages of various kinds and were annoying to support in the new fashion. The oldest supported database version now is the one from Syncthing 1.9.0 from Sep 7, 2020. - I changed config structs to be regular manually defined structs. For the sake of discussion, some things I tried that turned out not to work... ### Embedding / wrapping Embedding the protobuf generated structs in our existing types as a data container and keeping our methods and stuff: ``` package protocol type FileInfo struct { *generated.FileInfo } ``` This generates a lot of problems because the internal shape of the generated struct is quite different (different names, different types, more pointers), because initializing it doesn't work like you'd expect (i.e., you end up with an embedded nil pointer and a panic), and because the types of child types don't get wrapped. That is, even if we also have a similar wrapper around a `Vector`, that's not the type you get when accessing `someFileInfo.Version`, you get the `*generated.Vector` that doesn't have methods, etc. ### Aliasing ``` package protocol type FileInfo = generated.FileInfo ``` Doesn't help because you can't attach methods to it, plus all the above. ### Generating the types into the target package like we do now and attaching methods This fails because of the different shape of the generated type (as in the embedding case above) plus the generated struct already has a bunch of methods that we can't necessarily override properly (like `String()` and a bunch of getters). ### Methods to functions I considered just moving all the methods we attach to functions in a specific package, so that for example ``` package protocol func (f FileInfo) Equal(other FileInfo) bool ``` would become ``` package fileinfos func Equal(a, b *generated.FileInfo) bool ``` and this would mostly work, but becomes quite verbose and cumbersome, and somewhat limits discoverability (you can't see what methods are available on the type in auto completions, etc). In the end I did this in some cases, like in the database layer where a lot of things like `func (fv *FileVersion) IsEmpty() bool` becomes `func fvIsEmpty(fv *generated.FileVersion)` because they were anyway just internal methods. Fixes #8247
2024-12-01 15:50:17 +00:00
import (
"testing"
)
Base for better conflict resolution
2015-07-21 13:12:19 +00:00
func TestWinsConflict(t *testing.T) {
testcases := [][2]FileInfo{
// The first should always win over the second
lib/protocol, lib/model: Implement high precision time stamps (fixes #3305) This adds a new nanoseconds field to the FileInfo, populates it during scans and sets the non-truncated time in Chtimes calls. The actual file modification time is defined as modified_s seconds + modified_ns nanoseconds. It's expected that the modified_ns field is <= 1e9 (that is, all whole seconds should go in the modified_s field) but not really enforced. Given that it's an int32 the timestamp can be adjusted += ~2.9 seconds by the modified_ns field... GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3431
2016-08-06 13:05:59 +00:00
{{ModifiedS: 42}, {ModifiedS: 41}},
{{ModifiedS: 41}, {ModifiedS: 42, Deleted: true}},
Add LocalFlags to FileInfo (#4952) We have the invalid bit to indicate that a file isn't good. That's enough for remote devices. For ourselves, it would be good to know sometimes why the file isn't good - because it's an unsupported type, because it matches an ignore pattern, or because we detected the data is bad and we need to rescan it. Or, and this is the main future reason for the PR, because it's a change detected on a receive only device. We will want something like the invalid flag for those changes, but marking them as invalid today means the scanner will rehash them. Hence something more fine grained is required. This introduces a LocalFlags fields to the FileInfo where we can stash things that we care about locally. For example, FlagLocalUnsupported = 1 << 0 // The kind is unsupported, e.g. symlinks on Windows FlagLocalIgnored = 1 << 1 // Matches local ignore patterns FlagLocalMustRescan = 1 << 2 // Doesn't match content on disk, must be rechecked fully The LocalFlags fields isn't sent over the wire; instead the Invalid attribute is calculated based on the flags at index sending time. It's on the FileInfo anyway because that's what we serialize to database etc. The actual Invalid flag should after this just be considered when building the global state and figuring out availability for remote devices. It is not used for local file index entries.
2018-06-24 07:50:18 +00:00
{{Deleted: true}, {ModifiedS: 10, RawInvalid: true}},
all: Become a Go module (fixes #5148) (#5384) * go mod init; rm -rf vendor * tweak proto files and generation * go mod vendor * clean up build.go * protobuf literals in tests * downgrade gogo/protobuf
2018-12-18 11:36:38 +00:00
{{ModifiedS: 41, Version: Vector{Counters: []Counter{{ID: 42, Value: 2}, {ID: 43, Value: 1}}}}, {ModifiedS: 41, Version: Vector{Counters: []Counter{{ID: 42, Value: 1}, {ID: 43, Value: 2}}}}},
Base for better conflict resolution
2015-07-21 13:12:19 +00:00
}
for _, tc := range testcases {
refactor: use modern Protobuf encoder (#9817) At a high level, this is what I've done and why: - I'm moving the protobuf generation for the `protocol`, `discovery` and `db` packages to the modern alternatives, and using `buf` to generate because it's nice and simple. - After trying various approaches on how to integrate the new types with the existing code, I opted for splitting off our own data model types from the on-the-wire generated types. This means we can have a `FileInfo` type with nicer ergonomics and lots of methods, while the protobuf generated type stays clean and close to the wire protocol. It does mean copying between the two when required, which certainly adds a small amount of inefficiency. If we want to walk this back in the future and use the raw generated type throughout, that's possible, this however makes the refactor smaller (!) as it doesn't change everything about the type for everyone at the same time. - I have simply removed in cold blood a significant number of old database migrations. These depended on previous generations of generated messages of various kinds and were annoying to support in the new fashion. The oldest supported database version now is the one from Syncthing 1.9.0 from Sep 7, 2020. - I changed config structs to be regular manually defined structs. For the sake of discussion, some things I tried that turned out not to work... ### Embedding / wrapping Embedding the protobuf generated structs in our existing types as a data container and keeping our methods and stuff: ``` package protocol type FileInfo struct { *generated.FileInfo } ``` This generates a lot of problems because the internal shape of the generated struct is quite different (different names, different types, more pointers), because initializing it doesn't work like you'd expect (i.e., you end up with an embedded nil pointer and a panic), and because the types of child types don't get wrapped. That is, even if we also have a similar wrapper around a `Vector`, that's not the type you get when accessing `someFileInfo.Version`, you get the `*generated.Vector` that doesn't have methods, etc. ### Aliasing ``` package protocol type FileInfo = generated.FileInfo ``` Doesn't help because you can't attach methods to it, plus all the above. ### Generating the types into the target package like we do now and attaching methods This fails because of the different shape of the generated type (as in the embedding case above) plus the generated struct already has a bunch of methods that we can't necessarily override properly (like `String()` and a bunch of getters). ### Methods to functions I considered just moving all the methods we attach to functions in a specific package, so that for example ``` package protocol func (f FileInfo) Equal(other FileInfo) bool ``` would become ``` package fileinfos func Equal(a, b *generated.FileInfo) bool ``` and this would mostly work, but becomes quite verbose and cumbersome, and somewhat limits discoverability (you can't see what methods are available on the type in auto completions, etc). In the end I did this in some cases, like in the database layer where a lot of things like `func (fv *FileVersion) IsEmpty() bool` becomes `func fvIsEmpty(fv *generated.FileVersion)` because they were anyway just internal methods. Fixes #8247
2024-12-01 15:50:17 +00:00
if !tc[0].WinsConflict(tc[1]) {
Base for better conflict resolution
2015-07-21 13:12:19 +00:00
t.Errorf("%v should win over %v", tc[0], tc[1])
}
refactor: use modern Protobuf encoder (#9817) At a high level, this is what I've done and why: - I'm moving the protobuf generation for the `protocol`, `discovery` and `db` packages to the modern alternatives, and using `buf` to generate because it's nice and simple. - After trying various approaches on how to integrate the new types with the existing code, I opted for splitting off our own data model types from the on-the-wire generated types. This means we can have a `FileInfo` type with nicer ergonomics and lots of methods, while the protobuf generated type stays clean and close to the wire protocol. It does mean copying between the two when required, which certainly adds a small amount of inefficiency. If we want to walk this back in the future and use the raw generated type throughout, that's possible, this however makes the refactor smaller (!) as it doesn't change everything about the type for everyone at the same time. - I have simply removed in cold blood a significant number of old database migrations. These depended on previous generations of generated messages of various kinds and were annoying to support in the new fashion. The oldest supported database version now is the one from Syncthing 1.9.0 from Sep 7, 2020. - I changed config structs to be regular manually defined structs. For the sake of discussion, some things I tried that turned out not to work... ### Embedding / wrapping Embedding the protobuf generated structs in our existing types as a data container and keeping our methods and stuff: ``` package protocol type FileInfo struct { *generated.FileInfo } ``` This generates a lot of problems because the internal shape of the generated struct is quite different (different names, different types, more pointers), because initializing it doesn't work like you'd expect (i.e., you end up with an embedded nil pointer and a panic), and because the types of child types don't get wrapped. That is, even if we also have a similar wrapper around a `Vector`, that's not the type you get when accessing `someFileInfo.Version`, you get the `*generated.Vector` that doesn't have methods, etc. ### Aliasing ``` package protocol type FileInfo = generated.FileInfo ``` Doesn't help because you can't attach methods to it, plus all the above. ### Generating the types into the target package like we do now and attaching methods This fails because of the different shape of the generated type (as in the embedding case above) plus the generated struct already has a bunch of methods that we can't necessarily override properly (like `String()` and a bunch of getters). ### Methods to functions I considered just moving all the methods we attach to functions in a specific package, so that for example ``` package protocol func (f FileInfo) Equal(other FileInfo) bool ``` would become ``` package fileinfos func Equal(a, b *generated.FileInfo) bool ``` and this would mostly work, but becomes quite verbose and cumbersome, and somewhat limits discoverability (you can't see what methods are available on the type in auto completions, etc). In the end I did this in some cases, like in the database layer where a lot of things like `func (fv *FileVersion) IsEmpty() bool` becomes `func fvIsEmpty(fv *generated.FileVersion)` because they were anyway just internal methods. Fixes #8247
2024-12-01 15:50:17 +00:00
if tc[1].WinsConflict(tc[0]) {
Base for better conflict resolution
2015-07-21 13:12:19 +00:00
t.Errorf("%v should not win over %v", tc[1], tc[0])
}
}
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink