There was a logic mistake, so the limit in question wasn't used. On my
macOS this doesn't seem to matter, the hard limit returned is 2^63-1 and
setting the soft limit to that works. However I'm assuming that's not
the case for older macOSes since it was so nicely documented, so we
should still have this working. (10240 FDs should be enough for
anybody.)
With this change we emulate a case sensitive filesystem on top of
insensitive filesystems. This means we correctly pick up case-only renames
and throw a case conflict error when there would be multiple files differing
only in case.
This safety check has a small performance hit (about 20% more filesystem
operations when scanning for changes). The new advanced folder option
`caseSensitiveFS` can be used to disable the safety checks, retaining the
previous behavior on systems known to be fully case sensitive.
Co-authored-by: Jakob Borg <jakob@kastelo.net>
This matches the convention of the stdlib and avoids ambiguity: when
customErr{} and &customErr{} both implement error, client code needs to
check for both.
Memory use should remain the same, since storing a non-pointer type in
an interface value still copies the value to the heap.
So, in a funny plot twist, it turns out that WriteFile in Go 1.13
doesn't actually set the read only bit on Windows when called with
permissions 0444 so my test was broken. With an improved test it turns
out that Rename does not, in fact, overwrite a read-only file on
Windows. This adds a fix for that.
(Rename might get improved in Go 1.15...)
* lib/model: Don't panic on failed chmod-back on directory (fixes#5836)
This makes the "in writable dir"-wrapper log chmod-back errors instead
of panicking. To do that we need a logger so the function moved into the
model package which is also the only place it's used. The tests came
along.
(The test also exercised osutil.RenameOrCopy like some sort of
piggybacking. I removed that.)
After this change,
- Symlinks on Windows are always unsupported. Sorry.
- Symlinks are always enabled on other platforms. They are just a small
file like anything else. There is no need to special case them. If you
don't want to sync some symlinks, ignore them.
- The protocol doesn't differentiate between different "types" of
symlinks. If that distinction ever does become relevant the individual
devices can figure it out by looking at the destination when they
create the link.
It's backwards compatible in that all the old symlink types are still
understood to be symlinks, and the new SYMLINK type is equivalent to the
old SYMLINK_UNKNOWN which was always a valid way to do it.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3962
LGTM: AudriusButkevicius
Instead, trust (and test) that the temp file has appropriate permissions
from the start. The only place where this changes our behavior is for
ignores which go from 0644 to 0600. I'm OK with that.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3756
Fsyncing the file has a small performance penalty and seems unnecessary. The
file will be fsynced anyway, when the changes are commited to the database.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3749
These are no longer required with Go 1.7. Change made by removing the
functions, doing a global s/osutil.Remove/os.Remove/.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3514
