We need to reset prevSeq so that we force a full check when someone
reconnects - the sequence number may not have changed due to the
reconnect. (This is a regression; we did this before f6ea2a7.)
Also add an optimization: we schedule a pull after scanning, but there
is no need to do so if no changes were detected. This matters now
because the scheduled pull actually traverses the database which is
expensive.
This, however, makes the pull not happen on initial scan if there were
no changes during the initial scan. Compensate by always scheduling a
pull after initial scan in the rwfolder itself.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4508
LGTM: imsodin, AudriusButkevicius
Diff is large due to comment reformatting and indentation but all it
does is wrap the file mtime/size/permissions check in an "if
stat.IsRegular()".
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4507
This removes a significant, complex chunk of database code. The
"replace" operation walked both the old and new in lockstep and made the
relevant changes to make the new situation correct. But since delta
indexes we pretty much never need this - we just used replace to drop
the existing data and start over.
This makes that explicit and removes the complexity.
(This is one of those things that would be annoying to make case
insensitive, while the actual "drop and then insert" that we do is
easier.)
This is fairly well unit tested...
The one change to the tests is to cover the fact that previously replace
with something identical didn't bump the sequence number, while
obviously removing everything and re-inserting does. This is not
behavior we depend on anywhere.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4500
LGTM: imsodin, AudriusButkevicius
The folder marker conversion forgot to hide the .stfolder. This adds
that, for those who have not yet been converted.
Also adds Hide() calls to the folder start, to mend historical
unhidedness. (I'm sure this will upset someone who is manually managing
their .stignores in the other direction...)
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4384
Currently all errors during pulling and the first of these errors again on
finishing are logged to info. Besides that the errors logged when finishing
are stored in f.errors. This PR moves all logging during pulling to the debug
channel (they might still be relevant in some obscure debugging case) and
uses the stored errors to log the main error per fail when all pulling
iterations are done and failed.
Additional instead of trying 11 times it now only tries 3 times.
This is the first part of what is discussed here:
https://forum.syncthing.net/t/reduce-verboseness-of-puller/10261
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4338
Prior to this, the following is possible:
- Create a symlink "foo -> /somewhere", it gets synced
- Delete "foo", it gets versioned
- Create "foo/bar", it gets synced
- Delete "foo/bar", it gets versioned in "/somewhere/bar"
With this change, versioners should never version symlinks.
This solves the erratic test failures on model.TestIgnores by ensuring
that the ignore patterns are reloaded even in the face of unchanged
timestamps.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4208
The folder already knew how to stop properly, but the fs.Walk() didn't
and can potentially take a very long time. This adds context support to
Walk and the underlying scanning stuff, and passes in an appropriate
context from above. The stop channel in model.folder is replaced with a
context for this purpose.
To test I added an infiniteFS that represents a large amount of data
(not actually infinite, but close) and verify that walking it is
properly stopped. For that to be implemented smoothly I moved out the
Walk function to it's own type, as typically the implementer of a new
filesystem type might not need or want to reimplement Walk.
It's somewhat tricky to test that this actually works properly on the
actual sendReceiveFolder and so on, as those are started from inside the
model and the filesystem isn't easily pluggable etc. Instead I've tested
that part manually by adding a huge folder and verifying that pause,
resume and reconfig do the right things by looking at debug output.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4117
Harmonize how we use batches in the model, using ProtoSize() to judge
the actual weight of the entire batch instead of estimating. Use smaller
batches in the block map - I think we might have though that batch.Len()
in the leveldb was the batch size in bytes, but it's actually number of
operations.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4114
