We need to reset prevSeq so that we force a full check when someone
reconnects - the sequence number may not have changed due to the
reconnect. (This is a regression; we did this before f6ea2a7.)
Also add an optimization: we schedule a pull after scanning, but there
is no need to do so if no changes were detected. This matters now
because the scheduled pull actually traverses the database which is
expensive.
This, however, makes the pull not happen on initial scan if there were
no changes during the initial scan. Compensate by always scheduling a
pull after initial scan in the rwfolder itself.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4508
LGTM: imsodin, AudriusButkevicius
This removes a significant, complex chunk of database code. The
"replace" operation walked both the old and new in lockstep and made the
relevant changes to make the new situation correct. But since delta
indexes we pretty much never need this - we just used replace to drop
the existing data and start over.
This makes that explicit and removes the complexity.
(This is one of those things that would be annoying to make case
insensitive, while the actual "drop and then insert" that we do is
easier.)
This is fairly well unit tested...
The one change to the tests is to cover the fact that previously replace
with something identical didn't bump the sequence number, while
obviously removing everything and re-inserting does. This is not
behavior we depend on anywhere.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4500
LGTM: imsodin, AudriusButkevicius
The folder marker conversion forgot to hide the .stfolder. This adds
that, for those who have not yet been converted.
Also adds Hide() calls to the folder start, to mend historical
unhidedness. (I'm sure this will upset someone who is manually managing
their .stignores in the other direction...)
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4384
This solves the erratic test failures on model.TestIgnores by ensuring
that the ignore patterns are reloaded even in the face of unchanged
timestamps.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4208
The folder already knew how to stop properly, but the fs.Walk() didn't
and can potentially take a very long time. This adds context support to
Walk and the underlying scanning stuff, and passes in an appropriate
context from above. The stop channel in model.folder is replaced with a
context for this purpose.
To test I added an infiniteFS that represents a large amount of data
(not actually infinite, but close) and verify that walking it is
properly stopped. For that to be implemented smoothly I moved out the
Walk function to it's own type, as typically the implementer of a new
filesystem type might not need or want to reimplement Walk.
It's somewhat tricky to test that this actually works properly on the
actual sendReceiveFolder and so on, as those are started from inside the
model and the filesystem isn't easily pluggable etc. Instead I've tested
that part manually by adding a huge folder and verifying that pause,
resume and reconfig do the right things by looking at debug output.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4117
Harmonize how we use batches in the model, using ProtoSize() to judge
the actual weight of the entire batch instead of estimating. Use smaller
batches in the block map - I think we might have though that batch.Len()
in the leveldb was the batch size in bytes, but it's actually number of
operations.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4114
This deprecates the current minDiskFreePct setting and introduces
minDiskFree. The latter is, in it's serialized form, a string with a
unit. We accept percentages ("2.35%") and absolute values ("250 k", "12.5
Gi"). Common suffixes are understood. The config editor lets the user
enter the string, and validates it.
We still default to "1 %", but the user can change that to an absolute
value at will.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4087
LGTM: AudriusButkevicius, imsodin
This adds a new config AllowedNetworks per device, which when set should
contain a list of network prefixes (192.168.0.0/126 etc) that are
allowed for the given device. The connection service will not attempt
connections to addresses outside of the given networks and incoming
connections will be rejected as well.
I've added the config to the normal device editor and shown it (when
set) in the device summary on the main screen.
There's a unit test for the IsAllowedNetwork method, I've done some
manual sanity testing on top of that.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4073
One more step on the path of the great refactoring. Touches rwfolder a
little bit since it uses the Lstat from fs as well, but mostly this is
just on the scanner as rwfolder is scheduled for a later refactor.
There are a couple of usages of fs.DefaultFilesystem that will in the
end become a filesystem injected from the top, but that comes later.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4070
LGTM: AudriusButkevicius, imsodin
Basically, if we don't care about the sync status of the file we should
not tag someone else out of sync because they don't have the latest
version. This solves *my* "Syncing - 100%" scenario at least.
The reason this happens seems to be like this, in my situation. I have
three devices, connected in a "line": A-B-C. A is a Mac and litters
.DS_Store files everywhere. I've ignored these, but some escaped into
the folders before I did so. I've also ignored them on B and C but at
different stages. B was flagging C as out of sync, because at the point
the ignores were introduced C had a lower version of .DS_Store than A.
Now none of them are sending updates about it any more since it's
ignored...
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3981
After this change,
- Symlinks on Windows are always unsupported. Sorry.
- Symlinks are always enabled on other platforms. They are just a small
file like anything else. There is no need to special case them. If you
don't want to sync some symlinks, ignore them.
- The protocol doesn't differentiate between different "types" of
symlinks. If that distinction ever does become relevant the individual
devices can figure it out by looking at the destination when they
create the link.
It's backwards compatible in that all the old symlink types are still
understood to be symlinks, and the new SYMLINK type is equivalent to the
old SYMLINK_UNKNOWN which was always a valid way to do it.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3962
LGTM: AudriusButkevicius
Syncthing adds some hidden files when a folder is added, but there is currently
no equivalent cleanup procedure. This change is conservative as not to
accidentally cause data loss.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3874
