Skipping these makes the sequence numbering inconcistent; we've received
a file and suppsedly added it to the database, but if you check the
sequence number afterwards it didn't increase, i.e., we trigger [this
failure
condition](47f48faed7/lib/model/indexhandler.go (L447-L459))
and, similarly, a future update will look like there was a hole in the
numbering.
I propose to at least temporarily remove this optimisation in order for
things to make more sense. Is there a reason to keep this beyond saving
some database operations?
6d64daaba3