octoleo/qpdf
2
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/qpdf/qpdf.git synced 2024-11-16 01:27:07 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
1285f9767a
qpdf/TODO.md
Jay Berkenbilt 77e2b6e34e Note about incremental updates
2023-10-14 19:27:13 -04:00

40 KiB
Raw Blame History

Contents

Always

  • Evaluate issues tagged with next and bug. Remember to check discussions and pull requests in addition to regular issues.
  • When close to release, make sure external-libs is building and follow instructions in ../external-libs/README

Next

  • Spell check: Have the spell-check script synchronize cSpell.json with .idea/dictionaries/qpdf.xml, which should be set to the union of all the validated user dictionaries.
  • Fix #874 -- make args in --encrypt to match the json and make positional fill in the gaps
  • Maybe fix #553 -- use file times for attachments
  • std::string_view transition -- work being done by m-holger
  • Break ground on "Document-level work" -- TODO-pages.md lives on a separate branch.
  • Standard for CLI and Job JSON support for JSON-based command-line arguments. Come up with a standard way of supporting command-line arguments that take JSON specifications of things so that
    • there is a predictable way to indicate whether an argument is a file or a JSON blob
    • with QPDFJob JSON, make sure it is possible to directly include the JSON rather than having to stringify a JSON blob
    • One option might be to prepend file:// to a filename or otherwise to take a JSON blob. We could have that as a particular type of argument that would behave properly for both job JSON and CLI.
  • Support digital signatures. This probably requires support for incremental updates. See "incremental updates" in rejected ideas. That description is out of date but would need to be cleaned up. See also issue #22.
    • Make it possible to see incremental updates in qdf mode.
    • Make it possible to add incremental updates.

Possible future JSON enhancements

  • Consider not including unreferenced objects and trimming the trailer in the same way that QPDFWriter does (except don't remove /ID). This means excluding the linearization dictionary and hint stream, the encryption dictionary, all keys from trailer that are removed by QPDFWriter::getTrimmedTrailer except /ID, any object streams, and the xref stream as long as all those objects are unreferenced. (They always should be, but there could be some bizarre case of someone creating a PDF file that has an indirect reference to one of those, in which case we need to preserve it.) If this is done, make --preserve-unreferenced preserve unreference objects and also those extra keys. Search for "linear" and "trailer" in json.rst to update the various places in the documentation that discuss this. Also update the help for --json and --preserve-unreferenced.

  • Add to JSON output the information available from a few additional informational options:

    • --check: add but maybe not by default?

    • --show-linearization: add but maybe not by default? Also figure out whether warnings reported for some of the PDF specs (1.7) are qpdf problems. This may not be worth adding in the first increment.

    • --show-xref: add

  • Consider having --check, --show-encryption, etc., just select the right keys when in json mode. I don't think I want check on by default, so that might be different.

  • Consider having warnings be included in the json in a "warnings" key in json mode.

QPDFJob

Here are some ideas for QPDFJob that didn't make it into 10.6. Not all of these are necessarily good -- just things to consider.

  • How do we chain jobs? The idea would be that the input and/or output of a QPDFJob could be a QPDF object rather than a file. For input, it's pretty easy. For output, none of the output-specific options (encrypt, compress-streams, objects-streams, etc.) would have any affect, so we would have to treat this like inspect for error checking. The QPDF object in the state where it's ready to be sent off to QPDFWriter would be used as the input to the next QPDFJob. For the job json, I think we can have the output be an identifier that can be used as the input for another QPDFJob. For a json file, we could the top level detect if it's an array with the convention that exactly one has an output, or we could have a subkey with other job definitions or something. Ideally, any input (copy-attachments-from, pages, etc.) could use a QPDF object. It wouldn't surprise me if this exposes bugs in qpdf around foreign streams as this has been a relatively fragile area before.

Documentation

  • Do a full pass through the documentation.

    • Make sure qpdf is consistent. Use QPDF when just referring to the package.
    • Make sure markup is consistent
    • Autogenerate where possible
    • Consider which parts might be good candidates for moving to the wiki.

  • Commit 'Manual - enable line wrapping in table cells' from Mon Jan 17 12:22:35 2022 +0000 enables table cell wrapping. See if this can be incorporated directly into sphinx_rtd_theme and the workaround can be removed.

  • When possible, update the debian package to include docs again. See https://bugs.debian.org/1004159 for details.

Document-level work

  • Ideas here may by superseded by #593.

  • QPDFPageCopier -- object for moving pages around within files or between files and performing various transformations. Reread/rewrite _page-selection in the manual if needed.

    • Handle all the stuff of pages and split-pages
    • Do n-up, booklet, collation
    • Look through cli and see what else...flatten-*?
    • See comments in QPDFPageDocumentHelper.hh for addPage -- search for "a future version".
    • Make it efficient for bulk operations
    • Make certain doc-level features selectable
    • qpdf.cc should do all its page operations, including overlay/underlay, splitting, and merging, using this
    • There should also be example code

  • After doc-level checks are in, call --check on the output files in the "Copy Annotations" tests.

  • Document-level checks. For example, for forms, make sure all form fields point to an annotation on exactly one page as well as that all widget annotations are associated with a form field. Hook this into QPDFPageCopier as well as the doc helpers. Make sure it is called from --check.

  • See also issues tagged with "pages". Include closed issues.

  • Add flags to CLI to select which document-level options to preserve or not preserve. We will probably need a pair of mutually exclusive, repeatable options with a way to specify all, none, only {x,y}, or all but {x,y}.

  • If a page contains a reference a file attachment annotation, when that page is copied, if the file attachment appears in the top-level EmbeddedFiles tree, that entry should be preserved in the destination file. Otherwise, we probably will require the use of --copy-attachments-from to preserve these. What will the strategy be for deduplicating in the automatic case?

Text Appearance Streams

This is a list of known issues with text appearance streams and things we might do about it.

  • For variable text, the spec says to pull any resources from /DR that are referenced in /DA but if the resource dictionary already has that resource, just use the one that's there. The current code looks only for /Tf and adds it if needed. We might want to instead merge /DR with resources and then remove anything that's unreferenced. We have all the code required for that in ResourceFinder except TfFinder also gets the font size, which ResourceFinder doesn't do.

  • There are things we are missing because we don't look at font metrics. The code from TextBuilder (work) has almost everything in it that is required. Once we have knowledge of character widths, we can support quadding and multiline text fields (/Ff 4096), and we can potentially squeeze text to fit into a field. For multiline, first squeeze vertically down to the font height, then squeeze horizontally with Tz. For single line, squeeze horizontally with Tz. If we use Tz, issue a warning.

  • When mapping characters to widths, we will need to care about character encoding. For built-in fonts, we can create a map from Unicode code point to width and then go from the font's encoding to unicode to the width. See misc/character-encoding/ (not on github) and font metric information for the 14 standard fonts in my local pdf-spec directory.

  • Once we know about character widths, we can correctly support auto-sized variable text fields (0 Tf). If this is fixed, search for "auto-sized" in cli.rst.

Fuzz Errors

External Libraries

Current state (10.0.2):

  • qpdf/external-libs repository builds external-libs on a schedule. It detects and downloads the latest versions of zlib, jpeg, and openssl and creates source and binary distribution zip files in an artifact called "distribution".

  • Releases in qpdf/external-libs are made manually. They contain qpdf-external-libs-{bin,src}.zip.

  • The qpdf build finds the latest non-prerelease release and downloads the qpdf-external-libs-*.zip files from the releases in the setup stage.

  • To upgrade to a new version of external-libs, create a new release of qpdf/external-libs (see README-maintainer in external-libs) from the distribution artifact of the most recent successful build after ensuring that it works.

Desired state:

  • The qpdf/external-libs repository should create release candidates. Ideally, every scheduled run would make its zip files available. A personal access token with actions:read scope for the qpdf/external-libs repository is required to download the artifact from an action run, and qpdf/qpdf's secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN doesn't have this access. We could create a service account for this purpose. As an alternative, we could have a draft release in qpdf/external-libs that the qpdf/external-libs build could update with each candidate. It may also be possible to solve this by developing a simple GitHub app.

  • Scheduled runs of the qpdf build in the qpdf/qpdf repository (not a fork or pull request) could download external-libs from the release candidate area instead of the latest stable release. Pushes to the build branch should still use the latest release so it always matches the main branch.

  • Periodically, we would create a release of external-libs from the release candidate zip files. This could be done safely because we know the latest qpdf works with it. This could be done at least before every release of qpdf, but potentially it could be done at other times, such as when a new dependency version is available or after some period of time.

Other notes:

  • The external-libs branch in qpdf/qpdf was never documented. We might be able to get away with deleting it.

  • See README-maintainer in qpdf/external-libs for information on creating a release. This could be at least partially scripted in a way that works for the qpdf/qpdf repository as well since they are very similar.

ABI Changes

This is a list of changes to make next time there is an ABI change. Comments appear in the code prefixed by "ABI".

Always:

  • Search for ABI in source and header files
  • Search for "[[deprecated" to find deprecated APIs that can be removed
  • Search for issues, pull requests, and discussions with the "abi" label
  • Check discussion "qpdf X planning" where X is the next major version. This should be tagged abi

For qpdf 12, see https://github.com/qpdf/qpdf/discussions/785

C++ Version Changes

Use

// C++NN: ...

to mark places in the code that should be updated when we require at least that version of C++.

Page splitting/merging

  • Update page splitting and merging to handle document-level constructs with page impact such as interactive forms and article threading. Check keys in the document catalog for others, such as outlines, page labels, thumbnails, and zones. For threads, Subramanyam provided a test file; see ../misc/article-threads.pdf. Email Q-Count: 431864 from 2009-11-03.

  • bookmarks (outlines) 12.3.3

    • support bookmarks when merging
    • prune bookmarks that don't point to a surviving page when merging or splitting
    • make sure conflicting named destinations work possibly test by including the same file by two paths in a merge
    • see also comments in issue 343

    Note: original implementation of bookmark preservation for split pages caused a very high performance hit. The problem was introduced in 313ba08126 and reverted in the commit that adds this paragraph. The revert includes marking a few tests cases as $td->EXPECT_FAILURE. When properly coded, the test cases will need to be adjusted to only include the parts of the outlines that are actually copied. The tests in question are "split page with outlines". When implementing properly, ensure that the performance is not adversely affected by timing split-pages on a large file with complex outlines such as the PDF specification.

    When pruning outlines, keep all outlines in the hierarchy that are above an outline for a page we care about. If one of the ancestor outlines points to a non-existent page, clear its dest. If an outline does not have any children that point to pages in the document, just omit it.

    Possible strategy:

    • resolve all named destinations to explicit destinations
    • concatenate top-level outlines
    • prune outlines whose dests don't point to a valid page
    • recompute all /Count fields

    Test files

    • page-labels-and-outlines.pdf: old file with both page labels and outlines. All destinations are explicit destinations. Each page has Potato and a number. All titles are feline names.
    • outlines-with-actions.pdf: mixture of explicit destinations, named destinations, goto actions with explicit destinations, and goto actions with named destinations; uses /Dests key in names dictionary. Each page has Salad and a number. All titles are silly words. One destination is an indirect object.
    • outlines-with-old-root-dests.pdf: like outlines-with-actions except it uses the PDF-1.1 /Dests dictionary for named destinations, and each page has Soup and a number. Also pages are numbered with upper-case Roman numerals starting with 0. All titles are silly words preceded by a bullet.

    If outline handling is significantly improved, see ../misc/bad-outlines/bad-outlines.pdf and email: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#search/rfc822msgid%3A02aa01d3d013%249f766990%24de633cb0%24%40mono.hr)

  • Form fields: should be similar to outlines.

Analytics

Consider features that make it easier to detect certain patterns in PDF files. The information below could be computed using an external program that reads the existing json, but if it's useful enough, we could add it directly to the json output.

  • Add to "pages" in the json:

    • "inheritsresources": bool; whether there are any inherited attributes from ancestor page tree nodes
    • "sharedresources": a list of indirect objects that are "/Resources" dictionaries or "XObject" resource dictionary subkeys of either the page itself or of any form XObject referenced by the page.

  • Add to "objectinfo" in json: "directpagerefcount": the number of pages that directly reference this object (i.e., you can find an indirect reference to the object in the page dictionary without traversing over any indirect objects)

General

NOTE: Some items in this list refer to files in my personal home directory or that are otherwise not publicly accessible. This includes things sent to me by email that are specifically not public. Even so, I find it useful to make reference to them in this list.

  • Consider enabling code scanning on GitHub.

  • Add an option --ignore-encryption to ignore encryption information and treat encrypted files as if they weren't encrypted. This should make it possible to solve #598 (--show-encryption without a password). We'll need to make sure we don't try to filter any streams in this mode. Ideally we should be able to combine this with --json so we can look at the raw encrypted strings and streams if we want to, though be sure to document that the resulting JSON won't be convertible back to a valid PDF. Since providing the password may reveal additional details, --show-encryption could potentially retry with this option if the first time doesn't work. Then, with the file open, we can read the encryption dictionary normally. If this is done, search for "raw, encrypted" in json.rst.

  • In libtests, separate executables that need the object library from those that strictly use public API. Move as many of the test drivers from the qpdf directory into the latter category as long as doing so isn't too troublesome from a coverage standpoint.

  • Consider generating a non-flat pages tree before creating output to better handle files with lots of pages. If there are more than 256 pages, add a second layer with the second layer nodes having no more than 256 nodes and being as evenly sizes as possible. Don't worry about the case of more than 65,536 pages. If the top node has more than 256 children, we'll live with it. This is only safe if all intermediate page nodes have only /Kids, /Parent, /Type, and /Count.

  • Look at https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en

  • Consider adding fuzzer code for JSON

  • Rework tests so that nothing is written into the source directory. Ideally then the entire build could be done with a read-only source tree.

  • Large file tests fail with linux32 before and after cmake. This was first noticed after 10.6.3. I don't think it's worth fixing.

  • Consider updating the fuzzer with code that exercises copyAnnotations, file attachments, and name and number trees. Check fuzzer coverage.

  • Add code for creation of a file attachment annotation. It should also be possible to create a widget annotation and a form field. Update the pdf-attach-file.cc example with new APIs when ready.

  • Flattening of form XObjects seems like something that would be useful in the library. We are seeing more cases of completely valid PDF files with form XObjects that cause problems in other software. Flattening of form XObjects could be a useful way to work around those issues or to prepare files for additional processing, making it possible for users of the qpdf library to not be concerned about form XObjects. This could be done recursively; i.e., we could have a method to embed a form XObject into whatever contains it, whether that is a form XObject or a page. This would require more significant interpretation of the content stream. We would need a test file in which the placement of the form XObject has to be in the right place, e.g., the form XObject partially obscures earlier code and is partially obscured by later code. Keys in the resource dictionary may need to be changed -- create test cases with lots of duplicated/overlapping keys.

  • Part of closed_file_input_source.cc is disabled on Windows because of odd failures. It might be worth investigating so we can fully exercise this in the test suite. That said, ClosedFileInputSource is exercised elsewhere in qpdf's test suite, so this is not that pressing.

  • If possible, consider adding CCITT3, CCITT4, or any other easy filters. For some reference code that we probably can't use but may be handy anyway, see http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/ps/sdk/index_archive.html

  • If possible, support the following types of broken files:

    • Files that have no whitespace token after "endobj" such that endobj collides with the start of the next object

    • See ../misc/broken-files

    • See ../misc/bad-files-issue-476. This directory contains a snapshot of the google doc and linked PDF files from issue #476. Please see the issue for details.

  • Additional form features

    • set value from CLI? Specify title, and provide way to disambiguate, probably by giving objgen of field

  • Pl_TIFFPredictor is pretty slow.

  • Support for handling file names with Unicode characters in Windows is incomplete. qpdf seems to support them okay from a functionality standpoint, and the right thing happens if you pass in UTF-8 encoded filenames to QPDF library routines in Windows (they are converted internally to wchar_t*), but file names are encoded in UTF-8 on output, which doesn't produce nice error messages or output on Windows in some cases.

  • If we ever wanted to do anything more with character encoding, see ../misc/character-encoding/, which includes machine-readable dump of table D.2 in the ISO-32000 PDF spec. This shows the mapping between Unicode, StandardEncoding, WinAnsiEncoding, MacRomanEncoding, and PDFDocEncoding.

  • Some test cases on bad files fail because qpdf is unable to find the root dictionary when it fails to read the trailer. Recovery could find the root dictionary and even the info dictionary in other ways. In particular, issue-202.pdf can be opened by evince, and there's no real reason that qpdf couldn't be made to be able to recover that file as well.

  • Audit every place where qpdf allocates memory to see whether there are cases where malicious inputs could cause qpdf to attempt to grab very large amounts of memory. Certainly there are cases like this, such as if a very highly compressed, very large image stream is requested in a buffer. Hopefully normal input to output filtering doesn't ever try to do this. QPDFWriter should be checked carefully too. See also bugs/private/from-email-663916/

  • Interactive form modification: https://github.com/qpdf/qpdf/issues/213 contains a good discussion of some ideas for adding methods to modify annotations and form fields if we want to make it easier to support modifications to interactive forms. Some of the ideas have been implemented, and some of the probably never will be implemented, but it's worth a read if there is an intention to work on this. In the issue, search for "Regarding write functionality", and read that comment and the responses to it.

  • Look at ~/Q/pdf-collection/forms-from-appian/

  • When decrypting files with /R=6, hash_V5 is called more than once with the same inputs. Caching the results or refactoring to reduce the number of identical calls could improve performance for workloads that involve processing large numbers of small files.

  • Consider adding a method to balance the pages tree. It would call pushInheritedAttributesToPage, construct a pages tree from scratch, and replace the /Pages key of the root dictionary with the new tree.

  • Study what's required to support savable forms that can be saved by Adobe Reader. Does this require actually signing the document with an Adobe private key? Search for "Digital signatures" in the PDF spec, and look at ~/Q/pdf-collection/form-with-full-save.pdf, which came from Adobe's example site. See also ../misc/digital-sign-from-trueroad/ and ../misc/digital-signatures/digitally-signed-pdf-xfa.pdf. If digital signatures are implemented, update the docs on crypto providers, which mention that this may happen in the future.

  • Qpdf does not honor /EFF when adding new file attachments. When it encrypts, it never generates streams with explicit crypt filters. Prior to 10.2, there was an incorrect attempt to treat /EFF as a default value for decrypting file attachment streams, but it is not supposed to mean that. Instead, it is intended for conforming writers to obey this when adding new attachments. Qpdf is not a conforming writer in that respect.

  • The whole xref handling code in the QPDF object allows the same object with more than one generation to coexist, but a lot of logic assumes this isn't the case. Anything that creates mappings only with the object number and not the generation is this way, including most of the interaction between QPDFWriter and QPDF. If we wanted to allow the same object with more than one generation to coexist, which I'm not sure is allowed, we could fix this by changing xref_table. Alternatively, we could detect and disallow that case. In fact, it appears that Adobe reader and other PDF viewing software silently ignores objects of this type, so this is probably not a big deal.

  • From a suggestion in bug 3152169, consider having an option to re-encode inline images with an ASCII encoding.

  • From github issue 2, provide more in-depth output for examining hint stream contents. Consider adding on option to provide a human-readable dump of linearization hint tables. This should include improving the 'overflow reading bit stream' message as reported in issue #2. There are multiple calls to stopOnError in the linearization checking code. Ideally, these should not terminate checking. It would require re-acquiring an understanding of all that code to make the checks more robust. In particular, it's hard to look at the code and quickly determine what is a true logic error and what could happen because of malformed user input. See also ../misc/linearization-errors.

  • If I ever decide to make appearance stream-generation aware of fonts or font metrics, see email from Tobias with Message-ID 5C3C9C6C.8000102@thax.hardliners.org dated 2019-01-14.

  • Look at places in the code where object traversal is being done and, where possible, try to avoid it entirely or at least avoid ever traversing the same objects multiple times.

HISTORICAL NOTES

Performance

As described in https://github.com/qpdf/qpdf/issues/401, there was great performance degradation between qpdf 7.1.1 and 9.1.1. Doing a bisect between dac65a21fb and release-qpdf-7.1.1, I found several commits that damaged performance. I fixed some of them to improve performance by about 70% (as measured by saying that old times were 170% of new times). The remaining commits that broke performance either can't be correct because they would re-introduce an old bug or aren't worth correcting because of the high value they offer relative to a relatively low penalty. For historical reference, here are the commits. The numbers are the time in seconds on the machine I happened to be using of splitting the first 100 pages of PDF32000_2008.pdf 20 times and taking an average duration.

Commits that broke performance:

Other intermediate steps that were previously fixed:

  • 313ba08126 -- copy outlines into split: 0.55 -> 4.0
  • a01359189b -- fix dangling references: 4.0 -> 9.0

This commit fixed the awful problem introduced in 313ba081:

  • a5a016cdd2 -- revert outline preservation: 9.0 -> 0.6

Note that the fix dangling references commit had a much worse impact prior to removing the outline preservation, so I also measured its impact in isolation.

A few important lessons (in README-maintainer)

  • Indirection through PointerHolder is expensive, and should not be used for things that are created and destroyed frequently such as QPDFObjectHandle and QPDFObject.
  • Traversal of objects is expensive and should be avoided where possible.

Also, it turns out that PointerHolder is more performant than std::shared_ptr. (This was true at the time but subsequent implementations of std::shared_ptr became much more efficient.)

QPDFPagesTree

On a few occasions, I have considered implementing a QPDFPagesTree object that would allow the document's original page tree structure to be preserved. See comments at the top QPDF_pages.cc for why this was abandoned.

Partial work is in refs/attic/QPDFPagesTree. QPDFPageTree is mostly implemented and mostly tested. There are not enough cases of different kinds of operations (pclm, linearize, json, etc.) with non-flat pages trees. Insertion is not implemented. Insertion is potentially complex because of the issue of inherited objects. We will have to call pushInheritedAttributesToPage before adding any pages to the pages tree. The test suite is failing on that branch.

Some parts of page tree repair are silent (no warnings). All page tree repair should warn. The reason is that page tree repair will change object numbers, and knowing that is important when working with JSON output.

If we were to do this, we would still need keep a pages cache for efficient insertion. There's no reason we can't keep a vector of page objects up to date and just do a traversal the first time we do getAllPages just like we do now. The difference is that we would not flatten the pages tree. It would be useful to go through QPDF_pages and reimplement everything without calling flattenPagesTree. Then we can remove flattenPagesTree, which is private. That said, with the addition of creating non-flat pages trees, there is really no reason not to flatten the pages tree for internal use.

In its current state, QPDFPagesTree does not proactively fix /Type or correct page objects that are used multiple times. You have to traverse the pages tree to trigger this operation. It would be nice if we would do that somewhere but not do it more often than necessary so isPagesObject and isPageObject are reliable and can be made more reliable. Maybe add a validate or repair function? It should also make sure /Count and /Parent are correct.

Rejected Ideas

  • Investigate whether there is a way to automate the memory checker tests for Windows.

  • (This idea may be revised with alterations. Some of this is out of date.) Provide support in QPDFWriter for writing incremental updates. Provide support in qpdf for preserving incremental updates. The goal should be that QDF mode should be fully functional for files with incremental updates including fix_qdf.

    Note that there's nothing that says an indirect object in one update can't refer to an object that doesn't appear until a later update. This means that QPDF has to treat indirect null objects differently from how it does now. QPDF drops indirect null objects that appear as members of arrays or dictionaries. For arrays, it's handled in QPDFWriter where we make indirect nulls direct. This is in a single if block, and nothing else in the code cares about it. We could just remove that if block and not break anything except a few test cases that exercise the current behavior. For dictionaries, it's more complicated. In this case, QPDF_Dictionary::getKeys() ignores all keys with null values, and hasKey() returns false for keys that have null values. We would probably want to make QPDF_Dictionary able to handle the special case of keys that are indirect nulls and basically never have it drop any keys that are indirect objects.

    If we make a change to have qpdf preserve indirect references to null objects, we have to note this in ChangeLog and in the release notes since this will change output files. We did this before when we stopped flattening scalar references, so this is probably not a big deal. We also have to make sure that the testing for this handles non-trivial cases of the targets of indirect nulls being replaced by real objects in an update. I'm not sure how this plays with linearization, if at all. For cases where incremental updates are not being preserved as incremental updates and where the data is being folded in (as is always the case with qpdf now), none of this should make any difference in the actual semantics of the files.

  • The second xref stream for linearized files has to be padded only because we need file_size as computed in pass 1 to be accurate. If we were not allowing writing to a pipe, we could seek back to the beginning and fill in the value of /L in the linearization dictionary as an optimization to alleviate the need for this padding. Doing so would require us to pad the /L value individually and also to save the file descriptor and determine whether it's seekable. This is probably not worth bothering with.

  • Based on an idea suggested by user "Atom Smasher", consider providing some mechanism to recover earlier versions of a file embedded prior to appended sections.

  • Consider creating a sanitizer to make it easier for people to send broken files. Now that we have json mode, this is probably no longer worth doing. Here is the previous idea, possibly implemented by making it possible to run the lexer (tokenizer) over a whole file. Make it possible to replace all strings in a file lexically even on badly broken files. Ideally this should work files that are lacking xref, have broken links, duplicated dictionary keys, syntax errors, etc., and ideally it should work with encrypted files if possible. This should go through the streams and strings and replace them with fixed or random characters, preferably, but not necessarily, in a manner that works with fonts. One possibility would be to detect whether a string contains characters with normal encoding, and if so, use 0x41. If the string uses character maps, use 0x01. The output should otherwise be unrelated to the input. This could be built after the filtering and tokenizer rewrite and should be done in a manner that takes advantage of the other lexical features. This sanitizer should also clear metadata and replace images. If I ever do this, the file from issue #494 would be a great one to look at.

  • Here are some notes about having stream data providers modify stream dictionaries. I had wanted to add this functionality to make it more efficient to create stream data providers that may dynamically decide what kind of filters to use and that may end up modifying the dictionary conditionally depending on the original stream data. Ultimately I decided not to implement this feature. This paragraph describes why.

    • When writing, the way objects are placed into the queue for writing strongly precludes creation of any new indirect objects, or even changing which indirect objects are referenced from which other objects, because we sometimes write as we are traversing and enqueuing objects. For non-linearized files, there is a risk that an indirect object that used to be referenced would no longer be referenced, and whether it was already written to the output file would be based on an accident of where it was encountered when traversing the object structure. For linearized files, the situation is considerably worse. We decide which section of the file to write an object to based on a mapping of which objects are used by which other objects. Changing this mapping could cause an object to appear in the wrong section, to be written even though it is unreferenced, or to be entirely omitted since, during linearization, we don't enqueue new objects as we traverse for writing.

    • There are several places in QPDFWriter that query a stream's dictionary in order to prepare for writing or to make decisions about certain aspects of the writing process. If the stream data provider has the chance to modify the dictionary, every piece of code that gets stream data would have to be aware of this. This would potentially include end user code. For example, any code that called getDict() on a stream before installing a stream data provider and expected that dictionary to be valid would potentially be broken. As implemented right now, you must perform any modifications on the dictionary in advance and provided /Filter and /DecodeParms at the time you installed the stream data provider. This means that some computations would have to be done more than once, but for linearized files, stream data providers are already called more than once. If the work done by a stream data provider is especially expensive, it can implement its own cache.

    The example examples/pdf-custom-filter.cc demonstrates the use of custom stream filters. This includes a custom pipeline, a custom stream filter, as well as modification of a stream's dictionary to include creation of a new stream that is referenced from /DecodeParms.

  • Removal of raw QPDF* from the API. Discussions in #747 and #754. This is a summary of the arguments I put forth in #754. The idea was to make QPDF::QPDF() private and require all QPDF objects to be shared pointers created with QPDF::create(). This would enable us to have QPDFObjectHandle::getOwningQPDF() return a std::weak_ptr. Prior to #726 ( QPDFObject/QPDFValue split, released in qpdf 11.0.0), getOwningQPDF() could return an invalid pointer if the owning QPDF disappeared, but this is no longer the case, which removes the main motivation. QPDF 11 added QPDF::create() anyway though.

    Removing raw QPDF* would look something like this. Note that you can't use std::make_shared unless T has a public constructor.

    QPDF_POINTER_TRANSITION = 0 -- no warnings around calling the QPDF constructor QPDF_POINTER_TRANSITION = 1 -- calls to QPDF() are deprecated, but QPDF is still available so code can be backward compatible and use std::make_shared QPDF_POINTER_TRANSITION = 2 -- the QPDF constructor is private; all calls to std::make_shared have to be replaced with QPDF::create

    If we were to do this, we'd have to look at each use of QPDF* in the interface and decide whether to use a std::shared_ptr or a std::weak_ptr. The answer would almost always be to use a std:: weak_ptr, which means we'd have to take the extra step of calling lock(), and it means there would be lots of code changes cause people would have to pass weak pointers instead of raw pointers around, and those have to be constructed and locked. Passing std::shared_ptr around leaves the possibility of creating circular references. It seems to be too much trouble in the library and too much toil for library users to be worth the small benefit of not having to call resetObjGen in QPDF's destructor.

  • Fix Multiple Direct Object Parent Issue

    This idea was rejected because it would be complicated to implement and would likely have a high performance cost to fix what is not really that big of a problem in practice.

    It is possible for a QPDFObjectHandle for a direct object to be contained inside of multiple QPDFObjectHandle objects or even replicated across multiple QPDF objects. This creates a potentially confusing and unintentional aliasing of direct objects. There are known cases in the qpdf library where this happens including page splitting and merging (particularly with page labels, and possibly with other cases), and also with unsafeShallowCopy. Disallowing this would incur a significant performance penalty and is probably not worth doing. If we were to do it, here are some ideas.

    • Add std::weak_ptr parent to QPDFObject. When adding a direct object to an array or dictionary, set its parent. When removing it, clear the parent pointer. The parent pointer would always be null for indirect objects, so the parent pointer, which would reside in QPDFObject, would have to be managed by QPDFObjectHandle. This is because QPDFObject can't tell the difference between a resolved indirect object and a direct object.

    • Phase 1: When a direct object that already has a parent is added to a dictionary or array, issue a warning. There would need to be unsafe add methods used by unsafeShallowCopy. These would add but not modify the parent pointer.

    • Phase 2: In the next major release, make the multiple parent case an error. Require people to create a copy. The unsafe operations would still have to be permitted.

    This approach would allow an object to be moved from one object to another by removing it, which returns the now orphaned object, and then inserting it somewhere else. It also doesn't break the pattern of adding a direct object to something and subsequently mutating it. It just prevents the same object from being added to more than one thing.