Unignored files are marked as conflicting while scanning, which is then resolved
in the subsequent pull. Automatically reconciles needed items on send-only
folders, if they do not actually differ except for internal metadata.
This doesn't happen today, but it might in the future if the block size
were increased or made variable and we were talking to a client from the
future.
Since #4340 pulls aren't happening every 10s anymore and may be delayed up to 1h.
This means that no folder error event reaches the web UI for a long time, thus no
failed items will show up for a long time. Now errors are populated when the
web UI is opened.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4650
LGTM: AudriusButkevicius
This should address issue as described in https://forum.syncthing.net/t/stun-nig-party-with-paused-devices/10942/13
Essentially the model and the connection service goes out of sync in terms of thinking if we are connected or not.
Resort to model as being the ultimate source of truth.
I can't immediately pin down how this happens, yet some ideas.
ConfigSaved happens in separate routine, so it's possbile that we have some sort of device removed yet connection comes in parallel kind of thing.
However, in this case the connection exists in the model, and does not exist in the connection service and the only way for the connection to be removed
in the connection service is device removal from the config.
Given the subject, this might also be related to the device being paused.
Also, adds more info to the logs
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4533
We need to reset prevSeq so that we force a full check when someone
reconnects - the sequence number may not have changed due to the
reconnect. (This is a regression; we did this before f6ea2a7.)
Also add an optimization: we schedule a pull after scanning, but there
is no need to do so if no changes were detected. This matters now
because the scheduled pull actually traverses the database which is
expensive.
This, however, makes the pull not happen on initial scan if there were
no changes during the initial scan. Compensate by always scheduling a
pull after initial scan in the rwfolder itself.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4508
LGTM: imsodin, AudriusButkevicius
Diff is large due to comment reformatting and indentation but all it
does is wrap the file mtime/size/permissions check in an "if
stat.IsRegular()".
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4507
Currently all errors during pulling and the first of these errors again on
finishing are logged to info. Besides that the errors logged when finishing
are stored in f.errors. This PR moves all logging during pulling to the debug
channel (they might still be relevant in some obscure debugging case) and
uses the stored errors to log the main error per fail when all pulling
iterations are done and failed.
Additional instead of trying 11 times it now only tries 3 times.
This is the first part of what is discussed here:
https://forum.syncthing.net/t/reduce-verboseness-of-puller/10261
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4338
Prior to this, the following is possible:
- Create a symlink "foo -> /somewhere", it gets synced
- Delete "foo", it gets versioned
- Create "foo/bar", it gets synced
- Delete "foo/bar", it gets versioned in "/somewhere/bar"
With this change, versioners should never version symlinks.
The folder already knew how to stop properly, but the fs.Walk() didn't
and can potentially take a very long time. This adds context support to
Walk and the underlying scanning stuff, and passes in an appropriate
context from above. The stop channel in model.folder is replaced with a
context for this purpose.
To test I added an infiniteFS that represents a large amount of data
(not actually infinite, but close) and verify that walking it is
properly stopped. For that to be implemented smoothly I moved out the
Walk function to it's own type, as typically the implementer of a new
filesystem type might not need or want to reimplement Walk.
It's somewhat tricky to test that this actually works properly on the
actual sendReceiveFolder and so on, as those are started from inside the
model and the filesystem isn't easily pluggable etc. Instead I've tested
that part manually by adding a huge folder and verifying that pause,
resume and reconfig do the right things by looking at debug output.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4117
The mechanism to disallow manual scans before the initial scan completed
(#3996) , had the side effect, that if the initial scan failed, no further
scans are allowed. So this marks the initial scan as finished regardless of
whether it succeeded or not.
There was also redundant code in rofolder and a pointless check for folder
health in scanSubsIfHealthy (happens in internalScanFolderSubdirs as well).
This also moves logging from folder.go to ro/rw-folder.go to include the
information about whether it is send-only or send-receive
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4104
This deprecates the current minDiskFreePct setting and introduces
minDiskFree. The latter is, in it's serialized form, a string with a
unit. We accept percentages ("2.35%") and absolute values ("250 k", "12.5
Gi"). Common suffixes are understood. The config editor lets the user
enter the string, and validates it.
We still default to "1 %", but the user can change that to an absolute
value at will.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4087
LGTM: AudriusButkevicius, imsodin
One more step on the path of the great refactoring. Touches rwfolder a
little bit since it uses the Lstat from fs as well, but mostly this is
just on the scanner as rwfolder is scheduled for a later refactor.
There are a couple of usages of fs.DefaultFilesystem that will in the
end become a filesystem injected from the top, but that comes later.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4070
LGTM: AudriusButkevicius, imsodin
Adds a unit test to ensure we don't scan symlinks on Windows. For the
rwfolder, trusts that the logic in the invalid check is correct and that
the check is actually called from the need loop.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4042
After this change,
- Symlinks on Windows are always unsupported. Sorry.
- Symlinks are always enabled on other platforms. They are just a small
file like anything else. There is no need to special case them. If you
don't want to sync some symlinks, ignore them.
- The protocol doesn't differentiate between different "types" of
symlinks. If that distinction ever does become relevant the individual
devices can figure it out by looking at the destination when they
create the link.
It's backwards compatible in that all the old symlink types are still
understood to be symlinks, and the new SYMLINK type is equivalent to the
old SYMLINK_UNKNOWN which was always a valid way to do it.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3962
LGTM: AudriusButkevicius
