We have the invalid bit to indicate that a file isn't good. That's enough for remote devices. For ourselves, it would be good to know sometimes why the file isn't good - because it's an unsupported type, because it matches an ignore pattern, or because we detected the data is bad and we need to rescan it.
Or, and this is the main future reason for the PR, because it's a change detected on a receive only device. We will want something like the invalid flag for those changes, but marking them as invalid today means the scanner will rehash them. Hence something more fine grained is required.
This introduces a LocalFlags fields to the FileInfo where we can stash things that we care about locally. For example,
FlagLocalUnsupported = 1 << 0 // The kind is unsupported, e.g. symlinks on Windows
FlagLocalIgnored = 1 << 1 // Matches local ignore patterns
FlagLocalMustRescan = 1 << 2 // Doesn't match content on disk, must be rechecked fully
The LocalFlags fields isn't sent over the wire; instead the Invalid attribute is calculated based on the flags at index sending time. It's on the FileInfo anyway because that's what we serialize to database etc.
The actual Invalid flag should after this just be considered when building the global state and figuring out availability for remote devices. It is not used for local file index entries.
It's pretty much the GitHub standard, says the obvious, and does it
better than our old one which was a little bit rambling.
Intentionally just doing it instead of discussing it, in the hope of
avoiding trolling. So sue me.
To optimize WithNeed, which is called for the local device whenever an index
update is received. No tracking for remote devices to conserve db space, as
WithNeed is only queried for completion.
I'm trying to slowly clean this up a bit, and moving functionality out
into the folder types and having those methods not reach into model is
part of it. That can mean takign some odd arguments in the meantime,
some of those should probably become interfaces or properties on folder
in the long term.
The functionality was anyway mostly implemented there and not isolated
in the folderScanner type. The attempt to refactor it out in the other
direction wouldn't work given that the event loop and stuff is on
`folder`.
