So STDEADLOCK seems to do the same thing as STDEADLOCKTIMEOUT, except in
the other package. Consolidate?
STDEADLOCKTHRESHOLD is actually called STLOCKTHRESHOLD, correct the help
text.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4598
Two issues since the filesystem migration;
- filepath.Base() doesn't do what the code expected when the path ends
in a slash, and we make sure the path ends in a slash.
- the return should be fully qualified, not just the last component.
With this change it works as before, and passes the new test for it.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4591
LGTM: imsodin
This should address issue as described in https://forum.syncthing.net/t/stun-nig-party-with-paused-devices/10942/13
Essentially the model and the connection service goes out of sync in terms of thinking if we are connected or not.
Resort to model as being the ultimate source of truth.
I can't immediately pin down how this happens, yet some ideas.
ConfigSaved happens in separate routine, so it's possbile that we have some sort of device removed yet connection comes in parallel kind of thing.
However, in this case the connection exists in the model, and does not exist in the connection service and the only way for the connection to be removed
in the connection service is device removal from the config.
Given the subject, this might also be related to the device being paused.
Also, adds more info to the logs
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4533
When STHASHING is set, don't benchmark as it's already decided. If weak
hashing isn't set to "auto", don't benchmark that either.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4349
Starting stuff from init() is an antipattern, and the innerProcess
variable isn't 100% reliable. We should sort out the other uses of it as
well in due time.
Also removing the hack on innerProcess as I happened to see it and the
affected versions are now <1% users.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4185
The folder already knew how to stop properly, but the fs.Walk() didn't
and can potentially take a very long time. This adds context support to
Walk and the underlying scanning stuff, and passes in an appropriate
context from above. The stop channel in model.folder is replaced with a
context for this purpose.
To test I added an infiniteFS that represents a large amount of data
(not actually infinite, but close) and verify that walking it is
properly stopped. For that to be implemented smoothly I moved out the
Walk function to it's own type, as typically the implementer of a new
filesystem type might not need or want to reimplement Walk.
It's somewhat tricky to test that this actually works properly on the
actual sendReceiveFolder and so on, as those are started from inside the
model and the filesystem isn't easily pluggable etc. Instead I've tested
that part manually by adding a huge folder and verifying that pause,
resume and reconfig do the right things by looking at debug output.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4117
