The directive lives in its own isolated scope (where we put the visible() function). The stuff transcluded into the notification directive lives in the root scope and doesn't have access to the directive scope. Hence we cannot call dismiss() from inside the directive.
Similarly, config does not exist by itself in the directive scope, we need $parent to access the root scope.
Reference: https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/directive#isolating-the-scope-of-a-directive
How this worked before is a mystery. My guess is Angular bug with directive scope that was fixed in 1.3. One possibility is that transclude plus scope: true (which doesn't make sense as that is supposed to be an object) resulted in the root scope being used in the directive itself. This would then "work" as long as there is only one notification, as visible() and dismiss() would then be registered on the root scope, thus accessible from within the notification but also overridden by any notification rendered.
The directive lives in its own isolated scope (where we put the visible() function). The stuff transcluded into the notification directive lives in the root scope and doesn't have access to the directive scope. Hence we cannot call dismiss() from inside the directive.
Similarly, config does not exist by itself in the directive scope, we need $parent to access the root scope.
Reference: https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/directive#isolating-the-scope-of-a-directive
How this worked before is a mystery. My guess is Angular bug with directive scope that was fixed in 1.3. One possibility is that transclude plus scope: true (which doesn't make sense as that is supposed to be an object) resulted in the root scope being used in the directive itself. This would then "work" as long as there is only one notification, as visible() and dismiss() would then be registered on the root scope, thus accessible from within the notification but also overridden by any notification rendered.
To newer names better reflecting their types and yet sorting together
with folder.go. Doing it now without asking because there are no open
PRs that will get killed by it, and to avoid bikeshedding the names.
The actual pull method (which is really the only thing that differs
between them) is now an interface member which gets overridden by the
subclass.
"Subclass?!" Well, this is dynamic dispatch with overriding, I guess.
Added EXPOSE to Dockerfile. this way these ports will show up in docker GUIs like cockpit.
Added VOLUME parameter, this renders creating the folder (/var/syncthing) obsolete.
Instead of walking and unmarshalling the entire db and sorting the resulting
file infos by sequence, add store device keys by sequence number in the
database. Thus only the required file infos need be unmarshalled and are already
sorted by index.
