While attempting to fix#2782 I thought the problem was the
CheckFolderHealth method, so I cleaned it up. That turned out not to be
the case, but I think this is better anyhow.
It also moves the "create folder and marker if the folder was empty in
the index" code to StartFolder where I think it makes better sense.
This is covered by a number of existing tests.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3343
This adds a metric for "committed items" to the database instance that I
use in the test code, and a couple of tests that ensure that scans that
don't change anything also don't commit anything.
There was a case in the scanner where we set the invalid bit on files
that are ignored, even though they were already ignored and had the
invalid bit set. I had assumed this would result in an extra database
commit, but it was in fact filtered out by the Set... Anyway, I think we
can save some work on not pushing that change to the Set at all.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3298
This is in preparation for future changes, but also improves the
handling when talking to pre-v0.13 clients. It breaks out the Hello
message and magic from the rest of the protocol implementation, with the
intention that this small part of the protocol will survive future
changes.
To enable this, and future testing, the new ExchangeHello function takes
an interface that can be implemented by future Hello versions and
returns a version indendent result type. It correctly detects pre-v0.13
protocols and returns a "too old" error message which gets logged to the
user at warning level:
[I6KAH] 09:21:36 WARNING: Connecting to [...]:
the remote device speaks an older version of the protocol (v0.12) not
compatible with this version
Conversely, something entirely unknown will generate:
[I6KAH] 09:40:27 WARNING: Connecting to [...]:
the remote device speaks an unknown (newer?) version of the protocol
The intention is that in future iterations the Hello exchange will
succeed on at least one side and ExchangeHello will return the actual
data from the Hello together with ErrTooOld and an even more precise
message can be generated.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3289
I run a lot of builds. They're quite slow now:
jb@syno:~/s/g/s/syncthing $ BUILDDEBUG=1 ./build.sh
... snipped commands ...
runError: gometalinter --disable-all --deadline=60s --enable=varcheck . ./cmd/... ./lib/...
... in 13.00592726s
... build completed in 15.392265235s
That's 15 s total build time, 13 s of which is the varcheck call. The
build server is welcome to run it, but I don't want to on each build. :)
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3285
The purpose of this operation is to separate the serving of GUI assets a
bit from the serving of the REST API. It's by no means complete. The end
goal is something like a combined server type that embeds a statics
server and an API server and wraps it in authentication and HTTPS and
stuff, plus possibly a named pipe server that only provides the API and
does not wrap in the same authentication etc.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3273
This sacrifices the ability to return an error when creating the service
for being more persistent in keeping it running.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3270
LGTM: AudriusButkevicius, canton7
As noted in the ticket I no longer agree that dev builds should not auto
upgrade. The main reason is that we give dev builds to users to test
specific fixes, and noone is happier by them being inadvertently stuck
on that version when a newer version including the fix is released.
For developers, it's first of all probably unlikely that development is
happening on a build that's older than release, and secondly STNOUPGRADE
can be set in the environment once and for all if it an issue.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/3244
