* release:
lib/connections: Trust the model to tell us if we are connected
build: More signatures, more better (ref #3420)
lib/model: Trigger a pull when ignore patterns change
This should address issue as described in https://forum.syncthing.net/t/stun-nig-party-with-paused-devices/10942/13
Essentially the model and the connection service goes out of sync in terms of thinking if we are connected or not.
Resort to model as being the ultimate source of truth.
I can't immediately pin down how this happens, yet some ideas.
ConfigSaved happens in separate routine, so it's possbile that we have some sort of device removed yet connection comes in parallel kind of thing.
However, in this case the connection exists in the model, and does not exist in the connection service and the only way for the connection to be removed
in the connection service is device removal from the config.
Given the subject, this might also be related to the device being paused.
Also, adds more info to the logs
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4533
This should address issue as described in https://forum.syncthing.net/t/stun-nig-party-with-paused-devices/10942/13
Essentially the model and the connection service goes out of sync in terms of thinking if we are connected or not.
Resort to model as being the ultimate source of truth.
I can't immediately pin down how this happens, yet some ideas.
ConfigSaved happens in separate routine, so it's possbile that we have some sort of device removed yet connection comes in parallel kind of thing.
However, in this case the connection exists in the model, and does not exist in the connection service and the only way for the connection to be removed
in the connection service is device removal from the config.
Given the subject, this might also be related to the device being paused.
Also, adds more info to the logs
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4533
We need to reset prevSeq so that we force a full check when someone
reconnects - the sequence number may not have changed due to the
reconnect. (This is a regression; we did this before f6ea2a7.)
Also add an optimization: we schedule a pull after scanning, but there
is no need to do so if no changes were detected. This matters now
because the scheduled pull actually traverses the database which is
expensive.
This, however, makes the pull not happen on initial scan if there were
no changes during the initial scan. Compensate by always scheduling a
pull after initial scan in the rwfolder itself.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4508
LGTM: imsodin, AudriusButkevicius
This is step one of a hundred fifty on the path to case insensitivity.
It brings in the basic case folding mechanism and adds it to the
mtimefs, as this is something outside the fileset that touches stuff in
the database based on name. No effort to convert or handle existing
entries when the insensitivity is changed, I don't think we need it...
Useless by itself but includes tests and will reduce the review load
along the way.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4521
This makes it OK to not have any listeners working. Specifically,
- We don't complain about an empty listener address
- We don't complain about not having anything to announce to global
discovery servers
- We don't send local discovery packets when there is nothing to
announce.
The last point also fixes a thing where the list of addresses for local
discovery was set at startup time and never refreshed.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4517
Well Tested(TM)
Introduces a potential issue where we always pick some connectable but dodgy connection that breaks
soon after the TLS handshake.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4489
Diff is large due to comment reformatting and indentation but all it
does is wrap the file mtime/size/permissions check in an "if
stat.IsRegular()".
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4507
This removes a significant, complex chunk of database code. The
"replace" operation walked both the old and new in lockstep and made the
relevant changes to make the new situation correct. But since delta
indexes we pretty much never need this - we just used replace to drop
the existing data and start over.
This makes that explicit and removes the complexity.
(This is one of those things that would be annoying to make case
insensitive, while the actual "drop and then insert" that we do is
easier.)
This is fairly well unit tested...
The one change to the tests is to cover the fact that previously replace
with something identical didn't bump the sequence number, while
obviously removing everything and re-inserting does. This is not
behavior we depend on anywhere.
GitHub-Pull-Request: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/pull/4500
LGTM: imsodin, AudriusButkevicius
